论区分抢劫罪与敲诈勒索罪的“两个当

发布时间：2018-02-22 23:37

本文关键词： 抢劫罪敲诈勒索罪两个当场　出处：《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：抢劫罪与敲诈勒索罪的界分问题一直是司法实践中的难点问题,传统刑法理论中往往以是否当场使用暴力、是否当场取得财物作为两罪的区分标准,即“两个当场”标准。随着理论研究和司法实践的发展,“两个当场”标准存在的问题日益凸显出来:一方面,“两个当场”标准没有反映两罪在暴力程度方面的差异;另一方面,其中“当场取得财物”的要求对于区分两罪并没有实质的作用。同时大量的典型案件判决结果突破了“两个当场”标准。对此,我们应该从构成要件的角度,把握抢劫罪与敲诈勒索罪的本质区别,重新确立两罪的区分标准。本文结构如下:第一,“两个当场”标准与其存在问题。本部分介绍了“两个当场”的具体内涵和理论发展状况,同时在新的理论研究和司法实践状况下,发现“两个当场”标准所面临的问题。第二,对“两个当场”标准的理论分析。目前对于“两个当场”标准质疑很多,“两个当场”标准并不能够区分抢劫罪与敲诈勒索罪。第三,通过涉及两罪区分的典型案例,重新审视“两个当场”标准。第四,在借鉴国外立法和司法经验的基础上,提出区分抢劫罪与敲诈勒索罪的新标准,并分析其在类型化案件中的具体应用。在区分抢劫罪与敲诈勒索罪时,要明确以下两个要素:一是暴力程度是区分抢劫罪与敲诈勒索罪的关键;二是被害人在交付财物时的意志自由是两罪区分的重要因素。这两点是我们区分两罪的新标准。同时在典型的案件中要在把握这两点的基础上,具体问题具体分析。
[Abstract]:The problem of dividing the crime of robbery and extortion has always been a difficult problem in judicial practice. In the traditional theory of criminal law, whether to use violence on the spot or not to obtain property on the spot is the distinguishing standard of the two crimes. That is, "two spot" standards. With the development of theoretical research and judicial practice, the problems of "two on the spot" standards become increasingly prominent: on the one hand, the "two on the spot" standards do not reflect the differences in the degree of violence between the two crimes; on the other hand, Among them, the requirement of "obtaining property on the spot" has no substantive effect on the distinction between the two crimes. At the same time, the result of a large number of typical cases breaks through the standard of "two on the spot". Grasp the essential difference between robbery and extortion, The structure of this paper is as follows: first, "two on the spot" standard and its existing problems. This part introduces the specific connotation and theoretical development of "two on the spot". At the same time, under the new situation of theoretical research and judicial practice, the problems faced by the "two on the spot" standards are found. Second, Theoretical analysis of the "two on the spot" standard. At present, there are many questions about the "two on the spot" standard. The "two on the spot" standard cannot distinguish the crime of robbery from the crime of extortion. Thirdly, through a typical case involving the distinction between the two crimes, Reviewing the "two on the spot" standard. 4th. On the basis of drawing lessons from foreign legislative and judicial experience, the author puts forward a new standard to distinguish the crime of robbery from the crime of extortion. In distinguishing robbery crime from extortion crime, it is necessary to make clear the following two elements: first, the degree of violence is the key to distinguish robbery crime from extortion crime; Second, the free will of the victim in the delivery of property is an important factor in the distinction between the two crimes, which is a new standard for us to distinguish the two crimes. At the same time, on the basis of grasping these two points in a typical case, the specific problems should be analyzed concretely.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】