专断性医疗行为的刑法评价

发布时间：2018-02-23 00:40

本文关键词： 专断性医疗行为医疗事故罪故意伤害罪　出处：《南昌大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：专断性医疗行为是指违反充分说明义务或未尽充分说明义务且未经患者同意或同意无效以及履行了充分说明却未取得患者同意而经行实施的医疗行为，，并且包括紧急医疗行为和强制专断医疗行为。刑法上评价专断性医疗行为不能一概而论，应该具体问题具体分析。正当的专断性医疗行为要件主要包括医师实施专断性医疗行为必须符合医疗常规、行为人实施的专断性医疗行为必须符合医疗目的及其不应该超过必要的限度。因此总结三种具体情形，分别是患者滥用同意权、紧急医疗以及强制医疗行为。分析被害人承诺、紧急避险、目的正当以及具体说几种阻却专断性医疗行为违法性的理论，主张适用推定承诺阻却患方滥用同意权和紧急医疗，适用紧急避险阻却强制医疗。而如何对过当的专断性医疗行为定性，医疗事故罪和故意伤害罪皆有成立的可能性。
[Abstract]:An arbitrary medical act is a medical act that violates or fails to fully explain the obligation and is not valid without the consent or consent of the patient and has been performed without obtaining the consent of the patient. And includes emergency medical treatment and compulsory and arbitrary medical treatment. The criminal law on the evaluation of arbitrary medical behavior can not be generalized. It should be analyzed concretely. The elements of proper arbitrary medical behavior mainly include that doctors must conform to the routine of medical treatment when they carry out arbitrary medical treatment. The arbitrary medical behavior carried out by the actor must conform to the medical purpose and should not exceed the necessary limit. Therefore, three specific situations are summarized, namely, abuse of consent by patients, emergency medical treatment and compulsory medical treatment. In order to avoid risks in an emergency, the purpose is just and specific to prevent arbitrary medical behavior from breaking the law, and to advocate the application of presumption of commitment to prevent the party from abusing consent and emergency medical treatment, It is suitable for emergency avoidance but compulsory medical treatment. However, it is possible to establish the crime of medical malpractice and the crime of intentional injury.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】