禁止的风险与有责的轻率或疏忽:风险创制型犯罪刑法规范建构的挑战与困惑

发布时间：2018-02-24 00:43

本文关键词： 风险轻率疏忽风险创制型犯罪结果　出处：《中国刑事法杂志》2015年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：当代刑法规范体系没有区分行为规则问题与裁判原理问题,而只是通过建构主观构成要素界定规则的方式单方面强调裁判原理问题,最终导致刑法无法提供判断禁止风险的行为规则。以主观责任要素界定风险创制型犯罪无法准确描述法律禁止的风险,难以提供有效的行为规范指引,同时导致法律禁止风险规范界定主观化。从客观风险的角度界定行为规则有助于刑法引导社会公众行为认知的功能发挥。风险创制型犯罪刑法规范建构逻辑的问题在于结果 (包括法律禁止风险在内)与责任之间的关系过于疏远。系统化地对行为规则与裁判原理进行分离,有助于刑事立法重视风险界定,并且能够有效避免以主观责任要素为核心建构风险创制型犯罪刑法规范。
[Abstract]:There is no distinction between the rules of conduct and the principle of adjudication in the contemporary system of criminal law, but the principle of adjudication is emphasized unilaterally by the way of constructing the rules of defining the subjective elements of the criminal law. As a result, criminal law cannot provide the rules of conduct to judge and prohibit risk. The definition of risk creation crime by subjective responsibility elements can not accurately describe the risks prohibited by law, and it is difficult to provide effective guidance on behavior norms. At the same time, it leads to the subjectivization of the definition of the legal prohibition of risk norms. To define the behavior rules from the angle of objective risk is helpful for the criminal law to guide the social public's cognition of behavior. The question of the Construction Logic of the Criminal Law norms of risk creation crimes. The problem is that the relationship between results (including legal prohibition of risk) and liability is too distant. A systematic separation of rules of conduct from the principles of adjudication, It is helpful for criminal legislation to attach importance to the definition of risk and to effectively avoid the construction of criminal norms of risk-creating crime with subjective responsibility as the core.
【作者单位】：宾夕法尼亚大学法学院;华东政法大学科学研究院;
【分类号】：D914

【相似文献】