合同诈骗罪疑难问题研究

发布时间：2018-02-25 09:31

本文关键词： 合同合同诈骗犯罪对象非法占有民事欺诈　出处：《西南政法大学》2009年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 合同诈骗罪是破坏社会主义市场经济秩序罪中的新型多发性犯罪,随着我国市场经济的迅速发展,合同诈骗罪的社会危害性日益严重。但是,在刑法理论界和司法实务界,对如何正确认定该罪还有一些争议。本文主要围绕合同诈骗罪争议较大的五个问题,结合刑法理论和司法实践进行了初步探讨。本文分为五个部分,约31000字。一、合同诈骗罪中“合同”的界定。该部分着重探讨了三个问题。其一是合同诈骗罪中合同的内涵。笔者认为,合同诈骗罪中“合同”的内涵是在市场经济中体现合同诈骗犯罪的客体性质和合同当事人之间财产关系的财产合同。其二是合同诈骗罪中合同的外延。笔者系统探讨了《合同法》、《担保法》、涉外经济合同中可构成合同诈骗罪的合同种类。行政合同、劳动合同、国家合同不能成为合同诈骗罪中的合同。其三是合同诈骗罪中合同的形式。笔者认为,合同诈骗罪中的合同应以书面合同为原则,口头合同为例外。这里所说的口头合同,应仅限于经济合同的口头形式。二、合同诈骗罪犯罪对象研究。首先,笔者认为合同诈骗罪的对象应是公私财物,而非合同本身。其次,笔者探讨了不动产、知识产权、非法取得的财产、违禁品以及劳务能否成为合同诈骗的犯罪对象这一问题。笔者认为,不动产、非法取得的财产、部分违禁品可以成为合同诈骗罪的犯罪对象。而知识产权和劳务不能成为合同诈骗罪的犯罪对象。三、合同诈骗罪中犯罪目的研究。该部分着重探讨了三个问题。其一是“非法占有”与“非法占用”的区别问题。刑法上的非法占有完全可以理解为非法所有,而非法占用则是意图非法利用他人的财物为其牟利的意思。但是在一定的条件下,“非法占用”可以转化为“非法占有”。其二是“非法占有为目的”存在时间的认定问题。笔者认为,“非法占有目的”产生时间只能存在于合同签订之前或合同签订之后对方当事人交付(处分)财物之前。而不存在所谓的事后的故意。其三是“非法占有为目的”的司法认定问题。笔者认为,认定“以非法占有为目的”,应坚持主观与客观相结合及综合评判的评价方法,并提出了十种可以推定行为人具有非法占有目的的情况。四、合同诈骗罪“数额”问题研究。该部分着重探讨了三个问题。其一是合同诈骗罪数额的科学内涵问题。笔者对合同诈骗罪“数额较大”、“数额巨大”、“数额特别巨大”的具体数额标准作了大胆设计。其二是合同诈骗罪数额认定问题。合同诈骗罪数额的认定标准应以犯罪造成的直接损失额为准,同时以合同标的额作为量刑因素考虑。数额计算标准应以诈骗行为当时、当地该物品的市场价格为准,同时参照被骗者的实际损失。其三是连环合同诈骗数额和共同合同诈骗数额的计算问题。五、合同诈骗罪与民事欺诈行为的界限。该部分着重探讨了两个问题。其一是民事欺诈行为的含义及特征。其二是民事欺诈行为与合同诈骗罪的联系与区别。民事欺诈行为与合同诈骗罪在性质、主观方面、客观方面、客体、法律后果这五方面存在差异。
[Abstract]:The crime of contract fraud is a new type of multiple crime in the crime of undermining the order of socialist market economy, with the rapid development of China's market economy, the crime of contract fraud is more and more serious. However, in criminal law theory and the judicial practice, how to correctly identify the crime is still controversial. This paper mainly focuses on the five the larger problem of contract fraud dispute, combined with the theory of criminal law and judicial practice are discussed.
This article is divided into five parts, about 31000 words.
A contract fraud in the "contract" defined. This part mainly discusses three problems. One is the connotation of contract fraud crime. The author believes that the contract fraud in the "contract" connotation is in the market economy reflects the nature of the object of the crime of contract fraud and contract of property relations between the parties the second is the extension of property contract. Contract fraud crime. The author discusses "contract law", "guarantee law", the foreign economic contract can constitute the crime of contract fraud type of contract. Administrative contract, labor contract, contract not become national contract fraud crime of contract fraud is the contract. In the crime form. The author believes that the contract fraud in the contract shall be in written contract principle, oral contract as an exception. The oral contract, should be limited to the oral form of economic contract.
Two, research on the crime of contract fraud crime object. Firstly, the author thinks that the object of contract fraud should be the public or private property, rather than the contract itself. Secondly, the author discusses the real estate, intellectual property, illegal property, contraband goods and services can become the object of crime of contract fraud this problem. I think, not real estate, illegally acquired property, some contraband can become the object of the crime of contract fraud. But the intellectual property rights and labor can not become the object of the crime of contract fraud.
Three, the research purpose of crime in the crime of contract fraud. This part mainly discusses three problems. One is the difference between "the problem of illegal possession" and "illegal occupation" of illegal possession in criminal law can be understood as illegal possession, and illegal occupation of property is the intention of others for the illegal use of profit means but under certain conditions, the "illegal occupation" can be translated as "illegal possession". The second is "for the purpose of illegal possession of the problems in time. The author believes that" the purpose of illegal possession "time can only exist in the contract before the contract or the other party before delivery (punishment) property. Intentional but there is no so-called afterwards. The third is the" illegal judicial cognizance for the purpose of "possession. I think that" for the purpose of illegal possession ", should adhere to the combination of subjective and objective and comprehensive The evaluation method is combined with the evaluation method, and ten kinds of circumstances that can be presumed by the perpetrator with the purpose of illegal possession are put forward.
Four, the crime of contract fraud "amount" problem research. This part mainly discusses three problems. One is the scientific connotation of amount of contract fraud. The author of the contract fraud in the "large amount", "huge amount", "huge amount" of the specific amount of the standard made bold design. The second is the amount of the contract fraud identified. Direct losses cognizance standard amount of contract fraud should be caused by the crime as the standard, at the same time to the subject of the contract amount as sentencing considerations. Calculate the amount of the standard should be fraud at the time, the local goods market price as the standard, with reference to the actual loss. Third cheated is the problem of computing the amount of the amount of chain contract fraud and common contract fraud.
Five, the boundaries of the crime of contract fraud and civil fraud. This part mainly discusses two problems. One is the meaning and characteristics of civil fraud. The second is the relationship between civil fraud and contract fraud, civil fraud and contract fraud in nature, subjective, objective, object. There are five aspects of the legal consequences of this difference.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D924.3

【引证文献】