故意伤害罪在司法认定中的争议问题研究

发布时间：2018-02-26 22:08

本文关键词： 故意伤害司法实践特异体质犯罪未遂构罪标准　出处：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：故意伤害犯罪是严重危害人们群众的人身权利和社会秩序的安定的犯罪,在司法实践中是一种常见性、高发性的犯罪,并且在具体处理这些案件时’常常会引发各种争议。本文通过对司法实践中常见的争议进行分析,并借鉴域外法律在这些方面的规定及理论,提出对现行故意伤害罪立法方面进行完善,以期对司法实践有所裨益。本文共分三部分。第一部分为故意伤害罪的犯罪构成概述,为本文的基础理论,在确定故意伤害罪的概念的基础上对故意伤害罪的犯罪构成要件进行阐述。首先,故意伤害罪侵犯的客体是他人的身体健康权,该罪保护的法益即他人的身体健康,且该法益受到损害是行为人所追求或放任而导致的。其次,故意伤害罪的客观方面是指行为人实施的行为非法损害他人身体健康,即包括行为人客观上实施了伤害的行为;伤害行为具有非法性;伤害行为对他人必须造成一定的损害结果;伤害行为与伤害结果间要有因果关系。再次,故意伤害罪的主体是的一般主体,即达到刑事责任年龄并具备刑事责任能力的自然人,但该罪造成的结果不同,其刑事责任能力主体不同。最后,故意伤害罪主观方面表现为故意,包括直接故意和间接故意,甚至包括概括的故意。第二部分,从司法实践运用的角度出发,并结合各国相关法律的认定,对各争议问题的不同观点进行研究。在对故意伤害致特异体质者死亡案件研究中,从理论上分析此类案件的本质特征,认定结果加重犯性质的理论及分析主观上的罪过;并确定行为与结果之间的因果关系为条件说的客观归责理论;主观罪过方面上注意结果加重犯的特殊性。而故意伤害未遂问题上,从故意伤害未遂的构罪争议和故意伤害未遂的类型争议两方面进行分析,故意伤害未遂的构罪争议是指故意伤害罪中致人轻伤的是否存在犯罪未遂方面的争议,而类型争议实则是探讨故意伤害(重伤)的未遂类型。此外,由于我国实行的是简明立法例,对故意伤害罪的规定仅仅只是简单的几句话,所以在司法认定中也存在诸多争议,如“伤害行为”的认定就存在争议,本文从“伤害行为”的界定和方式入手,阐述如何对“伤害行为”进行认定。又如在司法实践中遇到的故思伤吾致多人轻伤及多次伤害致人轻伤问题,即使通过罪数的分析界定,亦不能较为完善的处理罪刑不相适应的问题。而在构罪标准方面,则通过理论分析和域外法律解释进行分析。第三部分,up针对本文前述问题,并结合司法实践,在不大规模改变现有法律条文以及理论体系的基础上,提出对现行故意伤害罪立法方面提出完善建议,建议设立“暴行罪”以及增加“情节较轻”和“情节严重”量刑档次。
[Abstract]:The crime of intentional injury is a crime that seriously endangers the people's personal rights and social order. It is a common and high incidence crime in judicial practice. And in the specific handling of these cases, 'will often cause a variety of disputes. Through the analysis of common disputes in judicial practice, and learn from the extraterritorial laws in these aspects of the provisions and theories, This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is an overview of the crime of intentional injury, which is the basic theory of this paper. On the basis of defining the concept of intentional injury crime, this paper expounds the constitutive elements of intentional injury crime. Firstly, the object of intentional injury crime infringement is the body health rights of others, and the legal interest protected by the crime is the physical health of others. Secondly, the objective aspect of the crime of intentional injury refers to the act of illegal harm to the physical health of others, that is, the act of harming the person objectively. The injurious behavior is illegal; the injurious behavior must cause certain damage result to others; there must be causality between the injurious behavior and the injurious result. Again, the subject of the crime of intentional injury is the general subject, That is, the natural person who has reached the age of criminal responsibility and has the capacity of criminal responsibility, but the result of the crime is different, and the subject of criminal responsibility is different. Finally, the subjective aspect of the crime of intentional injury is intentional, including direct intent and indirect intent. The second part, from the point of view of judicial practice, and combined with the recognition of relevant laws in various countries, to study the different viewpoints of various controversial issues. In the study of death cases caused by intentional injury to specific physique, This paper theoretically analyzes the essential characteristics of such cases, determines the theory of aggravating the nature of the result of the crime and analyzes the subjective guilt, and determines the causal relationship between the behavior and the result as the objective imputation theory. In terms of subjective guilt, attention is paid to the particularity of aggravated consequential offense. On the issue of attempted intentional injury, this paper analyzes the two aspects of the controversy of the construction of attempted intentional injury and the type dispute of attempted intentional injury. The dispute on the construction of attempted intentional injury refers to the dispute on whether or not there is an attempt to commit a crime caused by minor injury in the crime of intentional injury, while the dispute of type is actually to explore the type of attempt of intentional injury (serious injury). Because our country implements the simple legislation example, the stipulation of the crime of intentional injury is only a few words, so there are many disputes in the judicial cognizance, such as the identification of the "injurious act". This article begins with the definition and method of "injurious behavior", and expounds how to identify "injurious behavior". Even through the analysis and definition of the number of crimes, it is not possible to deal with the problem that the crime and punishment are not suitable. In terms of the standard of crime construction, it is analyzed through theoretical analysis and the interpretation of extraterritorial laws. The third part focuses on the above-mentioned problems in this paper. Combined with judicial practice, on the basis of not changing the existing legal provisions and theoretical system on a large scale, the author puts forward some suggestions to improve the legislation of the crime of intentional injury. It is suggested to establish "atrocity crimes" and to increase the penalty levels of "less serious" and "serious circumstances".
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】