虚假诉讼罪问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-01 03:26

本文关键词： 虚假诉讼罪犯罪构成停止形态罪数形态共犯形态　出处：《河北大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：虚假诉讼行为愈演愈烈,经过广泛征求意见,全国人大常委会于2015年8月29日通过了《刑法修正案(九)》,增加了虚假诉讼罪。虚假诉讼单独入罪有其必要性,首先,虚假诉讼行为具有严重的社会危害性,它不但损害司法公正与权威,浪费司法资源,而且还损害他人的合法权益。其次,我国97年刑法对虚假诉讼行为规制不足,理论界对虚假诉讼定性分歧较大,司法界对虚假诉讼定性难以统一,所以虚假诉讼单独入罪具有现实意义。虚假诉讼罪侵犯的客体为选择客体,不要求同时妨害司法秩序与侵犯他人合法权益,只要侵害到任一客体即可。虚假诉讼罪的客观方面从两方面进行分析,其行为方式表现为以捏造的事实提起民事诉讼,以妨害司法秩序或严重侵害他人的合法权益为虚假诉讼罪的结果要件;自然人可成为虚假诉讼罪的主体,其中司法工作人员利用职权,与他人共同实施虚假诉讼罪,从重处罚,同时单位也可成为虚假诉讼罪的主体;行为人主观方面表现为直接故意。正确认定虚假诉讼罪,关键在于划清罪与非罪的界限。虚假诉讼罪的结果要件表现为“妨害司法秩序或者严重侵害他人合法权益”,该结果要件存在认定标准模糊的情况,可以从虚假诉讼的次数、经济损失的数额或对司法审判程序造成混乱的程度等方面衡量。其次要严格区分虚假诉讼罪与诈骗罪、伪证罪、妨害作证罪和诬告陷害罪的界限。要准确把握虚假诉讼罪的停止形态、共犯形态与罪数形态。首先要划清虚假诉讼罪既遂形态、未遂形态、预备形态、中止形态之间的界限;其次要正确处理当事人之间、当事人与其他诉讼参与人之间、当事人与司法工作人员之间形成的共同犯罪问题;还要正确解决虚假诉讼罪与其他犯罪的竞合或牵连问题。
[Abstract]:After extensive consultation, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress adopted the Criminal Law Amendment (9) on August 29th 2015, adding the crime of false litigation. It is necessary for false litigation to be criminalized alone. First of all, False litigation has serious social harmfulness. It not only damages judicial justice and authority, wastes judicial resources, but also damages the legitimate rights and interests of others. Secondly, the criminal law of 1997 does not regulate false litigation. The theoretical circles have great differences on the nature of false litigation, and the judicial circles are difficult to unify the nature of false litigation, so it is of practical significance that false litigation is criminalized alone. The object of the crime of false litigation is the object of choice. It does not require that the judicial order and the legitimate rights and interests of others be infringed upon at the same time. As long as the object is infringed upon, the objective aspects of the crime of false litigation are analyzed from two aspects. A natural person may become the subject of the crime of false litigation, in which the judicial staff may use their authority to jointly carry out the crime of false litigation with others, and impose a heavier punishment on the crime of falsehood. At the same time, the unit can also become the subject of the crime of false litigation. The key is to draw a clear line between crime and non-crime. The result elements of the crime of false litigation are as follows: "impairing the judicial order or seriously infringing the legitimate rights and interests of others". The amount of economic loss or the degree of confusion caused to the judicial proceedings. Secondly, we must strictly distinguish the crime of false litigation from the crime of fraud and the crime of perjury. The limits of the crime of obstruction of testimony and the crime of false accusation should be accurately grasped, and the form of accomplice and the number of crimes should be accurately grasped. First of all, the boundary between the completed form, attempted form, preparatory form and suspension form of false litigation crime should be clearly defined. Secondly, it is necessary to correctly deal with the joint crime between the parties, between the parties and other litigant participants, between the parties and the judicial staff, and to correctly solve the problem of competing or implicating between the crime of false litigation and other crimes.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】