财产罪法益之探究

发布时间：2018-03-02 07:29

本文关键词： 财产罪法益占有说占有财产债权　出处：《广西师范大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：财产犯罪在我们的社会生活中具有多发的特性,因此对财产罪法益的研究具有深刻的现实意义。财产罪法益是一个重要的刑法概念,与其他刑法概念有着天然的血缘联系,对财产罪法益概念的深入探究,可以帮助我们更精确地判断财产犯罪的性质,构建财产罪体系,保护财产权利人的合法权益。但是,当前刑法学界对于财产罪法益的确定仍有着诸多的争论,因此,对财产罪法益进行界定并且解答有关财产罪法益的疑难问题,就显得尤为重要和迫切。为了更好地了解财产罪法益的概念,本文首先介绍了财产罪法益的发展历史。由于古代社会的资源匮乏,社会经济关系简单,财产罪法益在古代社会是一个较为简单的法律概念,但是随着社会经济的不断发展,财产罪法益的发展呈现出复杂化和扩大化的趋势。在此历史背景下,对财产罪法益的研究不是孤立的,只有理清财产罪法益与相关刑法概念的关系,并明确财产罪法益在整个刑法解释论中的地位,才能更好地构建财产罪法益体系,乃至整个刑法体系。日本、德国的财产罪法益理论研究在世界范围内处于领先地位,对日本、德国的财产罪法益理论进行学习和借鉴,是本文进行论证的基石。日本的财产罪法益理论注重财物背后权益的探讨,而德国的财产罪法益理论注重对财物自身属性的分析,是解决同一问题的两种思路。日本财产罪法益理论具有代表性的学说包括本权说、占有说以及从本权说或占有说出发的中间说,德国财产罪法益理论则以法律财产说、经济财产说以及法律经济财产说为代表,对这些学说的研究,可以帮助我们更好地认识到财产罪法益的本质。本文最终提倡占有说,是因为通过分析和比对,发现本权说在司法实践中存在诸多的困境,如对非法占有以及违禁品处理的不力,但若采用占有说并进行“修正”,则不会面临这些困境,因此占有说是更符合司法实践需求的学说。当然,对占有说的提倡还涉及相关占有问题的明晰,包括刑法与民法中占有的区别,以及刑法中占有的认定,本文对这些问题均一一做出了分析。需要承认的是,对占有说的提倡并不代表财产罪法益的完全明确,因为在现实的司法实践中某些特殊财物的占有认定是极其困难的,而且占有说是针对有体财物而言,对于无体财产性利益的侵害以及财物的经济价值(即成立财产罪要求认定的经济上的损害程度),依据占有说均无法得到解答。因此,本文在占有说的基础上,对具有代表性的几类特殊占有认定进行了论述,以期为其他特殊占有的认定提供基本的思路,并对财产经济价值的考量、不动产能否成为财产罪行为对象等问题进行了分析。最后,本文着重探讨了财产罪法益视角下的债权,并参照德国的财产罪法益理论学说,对不完全债权和与债权相关行为进行具体的探讨,目的是为了弥补占有说在解释论上的缺憾,为财产性利益的财产罪法益保护提供理由,以及确立经济损害的认定标准。
[Abstract]:Property crime has the characteristics of multiple in our social life, so the study of property crimes law has profound practical significance. Property crime law is an important concept of criminal law, there is a natural kinship with other criminal concept of property crime law benefits the concept of deep exploration, can help we more accurately judge the nature of property crime, building property crimes system, to protect the property rights of the legitimate rights and interests. However, the current criminal law to determine the property of the legal interest of the crime is still a lot of controversy, therefore, difficult problems are defined and answer questions about the crime of property law on property crime law benefits. It is particularly important and urgent.
In order to better understand the concept of crime of property interests, this paper first introduces the development history of property crime law. Because the ancient society lack of resources, social and economic relations, property crime law is a relatively simple legal concept in ancient society, but along with the social economy's development, the development of property crime law the benefit of showing a complex and expanding trend. In this historical background, the study of property crimes law is not isolated, only to clarify property crime law and the related legal concepts, and clearly on the status of the property crime law in the interpretation of criminal law, building property crimes law system in order to better, and the whole system of criminal law.
In Japan, research on the theory of legal interests of property crime in Germany is in the leading position in the world of Japanese, German property crime law theory reference and study, is the foundation of this argument. To investigate the Japanese property crime law theory on property rights behind Germany, and focus on the theory of legal interests of property crime analysis of the property itself, are two ways to solve the same problem. Japanese property crime law theory of representative theories including the right of possession, and from the right or possession of the center said, the German property crime theory of legal interests in property law, economy and property. The law of economic property as the representative, the study of these theories, we can better understand the essence of the property of the legal interest of the crime.
This paper finally advocate possession, because through the analysis and comparison, found this right to say that there are many difficulties in the judicial practice, such as the illegal possession of contraband and ineffective treatment, but if the use of possession and "correction" will not be faced with these difficulties, so for there are said to be more in line with the needs of the judicial practice the theory of possession. Of course, the related problems also advocate share clear, including the differences between possession in criminal law and civil law, criminal law and possession of identification, the paper on these issues are made one by one analysis.
Admittedly, the possession of that property advocate does not mean the legal interest of the crime completely clear, because in the reality of judicial practice in particular the possession of the property that is extremely difficult, and possession for the body of the property, the intangible property interests of the violations of property and economic value (the extent of damage the establishment of crime of property requirements identified on the economy, on the basis of possession) were unable to get answers. Therefore, based on the possession of that, the representative of several special possession cognizance are discussed, in order to provide the basic idea that other special possession, and the economic value of the property consider, real estate will become the issue of property crime object are analyzed. Finally, this paper focuses on the property of the legal interest of the crime from the perspective of creditor's rights, and said to refer to the German property crime law theory of incomplete The purpose of the discussion is to make up for the shortcomings of the theory of possession in the theory of interpretation, and to provide justification for the protection of legal interests of property interests, and to establish the criteria for determining economic damages.

【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D914

【参考文献】