当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

刑罚目的之再审视

发布时间:2018-03-02 17:16

  本文选题:刑罚目的 切入点:报应刑论 出处:《广西大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:刑罚自产生以来,与之相关的争论与探索就未曾停止过。在刑法学理论中,刑罚目的不仅影响着整个刑罚体系,也影响着整个刑事司法过程和社会的发展进步。基于不同的背景从政治、经济、文化、刑事政策,由不同角度对刑罚目的进行分析和研究。目的是全部法律的创造者。所有法律法规的的产生都源于某种特定目的和实质的动机。刑罚目的有其重要的理论意义和实践价值:它不仅在法律外部评价上对社会于刑罚的判断和评价有所影响:在法律的实践运行中对刑事立法、司法和执法均具有指导性决定作用;理论上是刑罚制度的正当化事由和存在的依据。所以,想正确理解和适用刑罚,必须明确刑罚的目的观,及其在整个刑罚体系中居于中心地位。 无论国外还是国内,关于刑罚目的在学派之间的对峙以及观点之间的分歧,时至今日仍未达成共识。从应刑论、目的刑论、一体论到具此些理论衍生的其他各种纷繁复杂的理论争论,应该知道,刑罚目的理论理应吸收并且结合报应、目的刑论之间的合理要素,并且对其中各要素作逻辑分析重点排序,务求实现多元化刑罚目的体系的内部和谐
[Abstract]:Since the birth of penalty, the related arguments and explorations have never stopped. In the theory of criminal law, the purpose of penalty not only affects the whole penalty system, It also affects the development and progress of the entire criminal justice process and society. Based on different backgrounds, from political, economic, cultural, criminal policy, The purpose is the creator of all laws. All laws and regulations are produced from a certain specific purpose and substantial motive. The purpose of penalty has its important theoretical significance and significance. Practical value: it not only has an influence on the judgment and evaluation of social penalty in the external evaluation of law, but also on the criminal legislation in the practice of law. Both the judicature and the law enforcement have the guiding and decisive function; theoretically, they are the justification of the penalty system and the basis of its existence. Therefore, in order to correctly understand and apply the penalty, it is necessary to make clear the view of the purpose of the penalty. And it occupies the central position in the whole penalty system. Whether at home or abroad, there is still no consensus on the confrontation between schools and views on the purpose of punishment. From this theory, we should know that the theory of the purpose of punishment should be absorbed and combined with retribution, the reasonable elements between the theory of teleological punishment, And make a logical analysis of the key elements in order to achieve the internal harmony of the multi-purpose system of punishment.
【学位授予单位】:广西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈兴良;周光权;;超越报应主义与功利主义:忠诚理论——对刑法正当根据的追问[J];北大法律评论;1998年01期

2 徐爱国;解析《圣经》里的法律思想[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2004年04期

3 衣家奇;;基督教原罪论对现代刑法的启蒙[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2006年03期

4 韩轶;刑罚目的层次性辩说——兼论刑罚的最终目的[J];法商研究;2004年04期

5 赵冬燕;;对刑罚报应性的理性思考[J];法学杂志;2006年03期

6 陈兴良;;宽严相济政策与刑罚规制[J];法学杂志;2006年04期

7 陈兴良;;刑罚改革论纲[J];法学家;2006年01期

8 屈耀伦;;预防与报应:刑罚目的的二元构建[J];法学评论;2006年01期

9 张莉;报应之刑与预防之刑的价值思考[J];公安大学学报;2002年06期

10 王宏玉;规诫的力量——谈刑罚之一般预防[J];中国人民公安大学学报;2004年01期



本文编号:1557446

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1557446.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户9e76a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com