刑事从业禁止适用问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-04 14:40

本文选题：从业禁止　切入点：保安处分　出处：《辽宁大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：2015年8月29日第十二届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十六次会议通过了《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(九)》,第一条增设了从业禁止规定,因利用职业便利实施犯罪,或者实施违背职业要求的特定义务的犯罪被判处刑罚的,人民法院可以根据犯罪情况和预防再犯罪的需要,禁止其自刑罚执行完毕之日或者假释之日起从事相关职业,期限为三年至五年。该法条的颁布标志着“从业禁止”的刑事法定化,从“行政从业禁止”上升为“刑事从业禁止”在我国刑法刑事处罚措施发展过程中具有着里程碑的意义。不仅完善了我国刑事处罚措施的内容,而且更好地发挥了刑法的一般预防和特殊预防的作用。但是“刑事从业禁止”作为一项新的法律规定,在理解和适用上存在着许多的问题。本文将分为五个部分论述“刑事从业禁止”的理解和适用问题。第一部分由一篇案例为引,提出关于“刑事从业禁止”在理解和适用中的问题,包括了刑事从业禁止的性质问题、与“行政从业禁止”的关系问题以及救济权缺失等问题;第二部分论证“刑事从业禁止”的性质在理论上应为保安处分,因为只有澄清了从业禁止的性质,才能使其得到合法且正当的适用;第三部分,回答了“刑事从业禁止”与“行政从业禁止”的关系问题,并且回答了了“从其规定”的理解和适用;第四部分论述“刑事从业禁止”的具体适用,从适用的主体条件、实质条件、刑罚条件和禁止内容四个小点,具体且全面的论述“刑事从业禁止”在现行的法律法规的条件下的应如何适用;第五部分论述了“刑事从业禁止”的救济权问题,从学理上论述救济权的内容和程序的问题。
[Abstract]:In August 29th 2015, at the 16th session of the standing Committee of the 12th National people's Congress, the Amendment to the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China (9) was adopted. Or if a crime that violates the specified obligations of an occupation is sentenced to a criminal penalty, the people's court may, on the basis of the circumstances of the crime and the need to prevent further crime, prohibit it from engaging in the relevant profession from the date of the completion of the execution of the penalty or the day of parole, The time limit is from three to five years. The promulgation of this article marks the criminal legalization of "prohibition of employment", From "prohibition of administrative practice" to "prohibition of criminal practice" has milestone significance in the development of criminal punishment measures in criminal law of our country, which not only improves the content of criminal punishment measures in our country, And has better played the role of general prevention and special prevention of criminal law. However, "prohibition of criminal practice" is a new legal provision. There are many problems in understanding and application. This paper will be divided into five parts to discuss the understanding and application of "prohibition of criminal practice". The first part is cited by a case. This paper puts forward some questions about the understanding and application of the prohibition of criminal practice, including the nature of the prohibition of criminal practice, the relationship between the prohibition of criminal practice and the prohibition of administrative practice, and the lack of the right to remedy. The second part argues that the nature of "criminal practice prohibition" should theoretically be a security measure, because only by clarifying the nature of the prohibition, can it be legally and properly applied. The author answers the question of the relationship between "prohibition of criminal practice" and "prohibition of administrative practice", and also answers the understanding and application of "from its provisions". Part 4th discusses the specific application of "prohibition of criminal practice" from the subject conditions of application. Substantive condition, penalty condition and prohibition content four little points, the concrete and comprehensive elaboration "criminal practice prohibition" under the current law and regulations condition how should apply; 5th part has discussed "the criminal practice prohibition" the relief right question, The content and procedure of the right of relief are discussed from the point of view of theory.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】