犯罪圈与刑法修正的结构控制
发布时间:2018-03-06 01:03
本文选题:犯罪圈 切入点:犯罪化 出处:《中国法学》2017年05期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:对刑法修正是否犯罪圈非理性扩张的问题,本文以一个"看得见的犯罪圈"作为检验工具,对刑法修正的合理性进行实证检验。在范伯格犯罪化理论的犯罪定义学再解读的基础上,以我国刑法新老文本全部罪名为样本进行比较观察,研究发现一个犯罪圈三环结构。其中心部分由所有可还原为暴力、偷窃、欺骗的典型犯罪构成,中环部分由典型性较弱的定制之罪构成,外环部分是犯罪圈的模糊边界。犯罪圈的三环结构及其比例分布与深埋在大量法条中的某些理论原则相暗合。将20年来刑法修正涉及的一百多个罪名导入三环结构后发现,有69.6%的新罪名和78.3%的放宽入刑范围罪名分布在犯罪圈的中心,是严密典型犯罪刑事法网的正常操作;26.8%的新罪名和18.3%的放宽入刑范围罪名分布在犯罪圈的中环,使某些不典型犯罪为什么入刑获得部分解释;只有3.6%的新罪名和3.3%的放宽入刑范围罪名落入犯罪圈边界,存在一定超越应然犯罪圈边界的风险。基于严而不厉理念和结构控制方法,本文提出,未来刑法修正应体现"结构还原"、"比例控制"、"罪刑有序"三个原则。
[Abstract]:As to whether the amendment of criminal law is an irrational expansion of criminal circle, this paper takes a visible circle of crime as a test tool. On the basis of the reinterpretation of Feinberg's criminalization theory, the author makes a comparative observation on all the charges in the new and old texts of the criminal law of our country. The study found a three-ring structure of a crime circle. The central part is composed of all typical crimes that can be reduced to violence, theft and deception, and the central part is made up of a typical crime of customization. The outer ring part is the fuzzy boundary of the crime circle. The three-ring structure and its proportional distribution of the crime circle are consistent with some theoretical principles deeply buried in a large number of laws. More than 100 charges involved in the amendment of the criminal law over the past 20 years have been introduced into the three-ring structure. 69.6% of the new charges and 78.3% of the relaxation of the scope of criminal offences are distributed in the center of the criminal circle, which is the normal operation of the strict typical criminal law net with 26.8% of the new charges and 18.3% with the relaxation of the scope of the criminal charges distributed in the Central District of the criminal circle. It gives some explanation of why some atypical crimes are committed; only 3.6% of the new charges and 3.3% of the relaxation of the scope of the crimes fall into the boundary of the crime circle. There is a certain risk of surpassing the boundary of crime circle. Based on the idea of strict but not severe and the method of structural control, this paper puts forward that the future revision of criminal law should embody three principles: "structural restoration", "proportional control" and "orderly punishment of crime".
【作者单位】: 北京大学法学院;
【分类号】:D924.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王利荣;;划分盗窃犯罪圈的基本规律[J];现代法学;2011年04期
2 张笑英;谢焱;;动态犯罪圈的完善——以刑法修正案的实体考量为视角[J];法学杂志;2009年03期
3 何柏松;;论聚众淫乱行为不应纳入犯罪圈[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2009年05期
4 郑士立;;职务犯罪圈划定的理论比较与分析[J];江西社会科学;2014年05期
5 马聪;杨银平;;论风险社会语境下刑事犯罪圈的扩张与合理限制[J];学理论;2013年18期
6 段丽;;犯罪圈的扩张及其合理限制——以我国刑事立法的变迁为视角[J];山西高等学校社会科学学报;2012年05期
7 张绍谦;;从刑罚特性看犯罪圈的界限[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2007年05期
8 蔡曦蕾;;中国四地洗钱罪规制状况对比研究[J];浙江工商大学学报;2014年03期
9 时延安;;刑法立法模式的选择及对犯罪圈扩张的控制[J];法学杂志;2013年04期
10 杜辉;;论定罪的评价对象[J];理论与改革;2013年05期
,本文编号:1572640
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1572640.html