当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

非法开采海砂行为的刑法定性分析

发布时间:2018-03-12 21:04

  本文选题:非法开采海砂 切入点:非法采矿罪 出处:《大连海事大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:近年来,随着经济社会的高速发展及各类基础设施规模和速度的提升,建筑市场对海砂的需求量大增,使海砂成了建筑市场的抢手货,在利益的驱动下,导致非法开采海砂活动屡禁不止,不仅给海洋生态环境安全造成一定的威胁,也给生态文明建设造成一定的破坏。一些地方正在探索通过追究非法开采海砂者刑事责任对其有所遏制。但因行政法规规定的处罚力度有限,行政执法人员疲于应对但难以根除。目前,一些地方正在探索通过追究非法采砂者刑事责任对其有所遏制,但就刑事法律规定而言,并没有针对非法开采海砂的行为而做出明确规定。参照国内有些地方以非法采矿罪对非法开采海砂者实施刑事处罚,近来某省已经宣判对非法开采海砂者以非法采矿罪追究刑事责任。但笔者认为,以此罪名追究非法开采海砂刑事责任,还不够全面。 文章通过对海域内非法采砂涉嫌犯罪与非法采矿罪对比分析,提出对以非法采矿罪追究非法开采海砂行为刑事责任的看法。本文的写作主要分为以下三个部分: 第一部分,主要是对非法开采海砂行为的刑法理论视角进行,本部分是研究非法开采海砂行为的刑法问题的理论基础。本部分中,笔者主要介绍了非法开采海砂行为的犯罪客体、犯罪客观方面、犯罪主体以及犯罪主观方面,并将各部分进行深入展开。 第二部分,从非法开采海砂行为的刑法处理模式现状入手,对司法实务中对非法开采海砂行为的主要相关罪名予以简要分析,并指出在规制非法开采海砂行为方面我国刑法所存在的局限;并提出我国司法实践中,在对非法开采海砂行为规制所存在的尴尬,进而对其进行反思,理清问题出现的原因,为接下来寻找解决方法提供明确的法律依据。 第三部分,笔者基于前文所述,对我国非法开采海砂行为提出以非法采矿罪予以规制,并提出了刑事立法建言与相应对策。具体内容与本文第二部分相承接,涉及明确非法采矿罪的犯罪情节、加重刑罚处罚以及设立资格刑、完善相关法律的协调因素等,有效的提高刑法对非法开采海砂行为的规制功能,对非法开采海砂行为的犯罪进行有效的刑法规制。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of economy and society and the improvement of the scale and speed of all kinds of infrastructure, the demand for sea sand in the construction market has greatly increased. Leading to illegal exploitation of sea sand, which is not only a threat to the security of the marine ecological environment, It has also caused certain damage to the construction of ecological civilization. Some places are exploring to curb the illegal exploitation of sea sand by investigating their criminal liability. However, due to the limited degree of punishment stipulated by administrative laws and regulations, Administrative law enforcement officials are struggling to cope but are hard to eradicate. At present, some places are exploring to curb illegal sand miners by holding them accountable, but as far as criminal law is concerned, There is no specific provision for illegal exploitation of sea sand. Referring to the criminal punishment of illegal mining of sea sand in some parts of the country, Recently, a province has pronounced criminal responsibility for illegal exploitation of sea sand by illegal mining. However, the author thinks that it is not comprehensive enough to investigate criminal responsibility for illegal exploitation of sea sand. Through the comparative analysis of the suspected crime of illegal sand mining and the crime of illegal mining in the sea area, this paper puts forward the view of investigating the criminal responsibility of illegal mining of sea sand with the crime of illegal mining. The writing of this article is mainly divided into three parts as follows:. The first part, mainly carries on to the illegal exploitation sea sand behavior criminal law theory angle of view, this part is the research illegal mining sea sand behavior criminal law question theory foundation. The author mainly introduces the object of crime, the objective aspect of crime, the subject of crime and the subjective aspect of crime. The second part, starting with the current situation of criminal law treatment mode of illegal exploitation of sea sand, briefly analyzes the main related charges of illegal exploitation of sea sand in judicial practice. It also points out the limitations of criminal law in regulating the illegal exploitation of sea sand, and points out the embarrassment of the regulation of illegal exploitation of sea sand in our country's judicial practice, and then reflects on it and clarifies the causes of the problems. To provide a clear legal basis for the next to find a solution. In the third part, based on the above mentioned, the author puts forward to regulate the illegal mining of sea sand in our country, and puts forward the suggestion of criminal legislation and the corresponding countermeasures. It involves making clear the criminal circumstances of illegal mining crime, aggravating penalty and establishing qualification penalty, perfecting the coordination factors of relevant laws, and effectively improving the regulation function of criminal law on illegal exploitation of sea sand. The crime of illegal exploitation of sea sand is effectively regulated by criminal law.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 谢青霞;吕东锋;;对我国刑法第343条之思考——非法采矿罪与破坏性采矿罪立法之修改建议[J];重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版);2007年02期

2 谢雄伟;非法采矿罪的立法完善研究[J];中国地质大学学报(社会科学版);2004年06期

3 孙绍伟;刘伟;;矿产资源犯罪刑事立法完善的思考[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2010年02期

4 吴晓娜;;浅议汽车“碰瓷”行为的定性[J];法制与社会;2012年30期

5 于冲;;海洋环境危害行为的刑事规制体系探究[J];三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版);2012年03期

6 施星平;罗家诚;杨明礼;兰岚;陆凌;钱建建;赵健;;海砂开采违法行为查处适用法律依据研究[J];海洋开发与管理;2007年01期

7 苏东甫;王桂全;;我国海砂资源开发现状与管理对策探讨[J];海洋开发与管理;2010年04期

8 尹飞龙;欧阳东;温喜廉a;黄华县;;海砂与河砂、尾砂作为建筑用砂的比较研究[J];混凝土;2011年12期

9 张永红,刘净;浅谈非法采矿罪与破坏性采矿罪的区分[J];新疆警官高等专科学校学报;2002年04期

10 于冲;;海洋资源盗窃行为的刑法学思考——以“盗挖海砂”现象为背景[J];江西警察学院学报;2011年03期



本文编号:1603281

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1603281.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d6eca***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com