论“脱保”后自首的认定

发布时间：2018-03-14 03:20

本文选题：自首　切入点：脱保　出处：《沈阳师范大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：文章主要研究“脱保”后有关自首的认定情况,为了对问题更细致的进行研究,论文又分为“‘脱保’后再自首的认定”和“脱保后余罪自首的认定”两种情况分别进行论述。对于上述两种情况,在我国的立法及相关的司法解释中并没有给出确切的规定,似乎已经成为在认定自首中的疑难问题。这就需要我们从现有的法律规定以及司法解释中去探求自首规定的本意以及自首的立法宗旨,来解释疑难的司法案例。在司法实践中,我国一直面临超期羁押等问题,所以在新刑诉法修改中对强制措施做了重要修改,这势必带来取保候审等强制措施在司法实践中会被大量运用,而在取保候审期间的脱逃后又主动归案、如实供述自己罪行的自首认定方面,法律并没有做出具体的规定,但司法实践中确大量存在,在认定是否是自首也存在争议,这就值得我们去研究,以便更好地指导司法实践活动。在研究方法方面,主要借助类似的案件情况,但不同地区的法院却给出了不同的判决,来引出我们所要研究的问题。对“脱保”后自首的认定,主要还是借助于一般自首的规定进行认定,所以说,在对不同的意见理由和分歧进行阐述后,对什么是一般自首在理论概念上做了一次系统的论述。通过对一般理论的分析,达到用最一般的理论来解释一些复杂的案件情形,最终解决这一类的司法难题。在最后的研究结论方面,无论是“脱保”后的再投案还是对余罪的供述,笔者都倾向于认定自首,并对我国在自首方面的完善给出了一些自己的建议。
[Abstract]:In order to study the problem more carefully, the article mainly studies the identification of voluntary surrender after the release of the guarantee. The thesis is divided into two situations: "the confirmation of the surrender after the release of bail" and "the identification of the residual crime after the withdrawal of bail". There are no definite provisions in the legislation and the relevant judicial interpretation of the above two cases. It seems to have become a difficult problem in the determination of surrender. This requires us to explore the original meaning of voluntary surrender and the legislative purpose of voluntary surrender from existing legal provisions and judicial interpretations to explain difficult judicial cases. In judicial practice, Our country has been faced with problems such as extended detention, so we have made important changes in the revision of the new Criminal procedure Law, which is bound to bring about a large number of applications of compulsory measures such as bail pending trial in judicial practice. However, the law has not made any specific provisions in the aspect of voluntary surrender of truthful confession of one's own crime after escaping from custody pending trial, but in judicial practice, there are a large number of cases, and there are disputes as to whether the confession is voluntary. This is worth studying in order to better guide judicial practice. In terms of research methods, we mainly rely on similar cases, but courts in different regions have given different judgments. To lead to the problems we are going to study. The determination of voluntary surrender after "withdrawal of the guarantee" is mainly determined by the provisions of the general surrender. So, after explaining the reasons and differences of opinion, This paper makes a systematic exposition on the theoretical concept of general voluntary surrender. Through the analysis of the general theory, we can use the most general theory to explain some complicated cases. Finally solve this kind of judicial problem. In the final research conclusion, whether it is the resurrender after "release of bail" or the confession of the remaining crimes, the author tends to identify surrender. The author also gives some suggestions on the perfection of China's voluntary surrender.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】