论原因自由行为

发布时间：2018-03-17 03:23

本文选题：原因自由行为　切入点：可罚性　出处：《兰州大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：原因自由行为主要是在大陆法系国家尤其是德、日刑法中使用的概念。在英美法系国家,缺乏系统的刑法理论术语,但在长期的判例积累中沉淀了相当丰富的刑法思想与理论,尽管没有原因自由行为的概念,对于因醉酒及其他原因陷入无责任能力或限制责任能力而为犯罪者,判例相当丰富。但是原因自由行为在分类、构成、特征、可罚性、犯罪类型、适用方面都没有完全确定的通说。由此,本文将从以下几个方面展开论述：一是从原因自由行为的历史沿革入手,分析原因自由行为的历史背景,增加对其产生的渊源进行研究,为进一步的学习和论述打下基础。二是对原因自由行为概念的界定、国内外差异等进行评述,进一步确定研究方向。三是对原因自由行为主、客观方面进行分析。四是结合中外理论研究,对原因自由行为的可罚性进行探讨,为原因自由行为的实施和立法提供可罚性依据。五是对原因自由行为的故意犯和过失犯进行分类比较,特别是对二者的认定和适用范围加以研究,明确不同的刑罚措施。本文研究重点在于：一方面,对部分大陆法系国家的相关法例进行立法比较,尤其对大陆法系和英美法系的相关理论进行研究,从中对有益于我国的司法实践部分加以借鉴。另一方面,对于原因自由行为进入我国理论界以来,我国学者对其是否适应我国司法实践等方面进行了分析和探讨,从个人视角对我国刑法增加原因自由行为立法的必要性进行阐述。同时,结合《刑法》第一百三十三条之一关于“醉驾入罪”等热点问题,对原因自由行为的“本土化”问题进行论述。
[Abstract]:The reason free behavior is mainly used in the civil law countries, especially in the German and Japanese criminal law. In the common law countries, there is a lack of systematic terms of criminal law theory, but in the long-term accumulation of legal precedents, there has been a considerable accumulation of criminal law ideas and theories. Although there is no concept of the free act of reason, there is a wealth of jurisprudence on the part of the perpetrator of the crime of incapacity or limitation of liability due to drunkenness and other reasons. But the free act of reason is classified, constituted, characterized, punishable, Therefore, this paper will discuss the following aspects: first, from the historical evolution of the cause of free behavior, analyze the historical background of the free behavior of reason, In order to lay a foundation for further study and discussion, the second is to comment on the definition of the concept of cause free behavior and the differences between domestic and foreign countries, to further determine the research direction. Third, to give priority to the free movement of reason. Fourth, combining with the theoretical research of China and foreign countries, the author probes into the punishment of the cause of free behavior. The fifth is to classify and compare the intentional offense and negligent offense of the cause free act, especially to study the identification and application scope of the two, and to clarify the different penalty measures. The focus of this paper is: on the one hand, comparing the relevant legislation of some civil law countries, especially the relevant theories of civil law system and common law system. On the other hand, on the other hand, since the free action of reason entered the theoretical circle of our country, Chinese scholars have analyzed and discussed whether it is suitable for the judicial practice of our country. This paper expounds the necessity of legislation on the increase of cause-free behavior in Chinese criminal law from a personal angle of view. At the same time, combining with one of the 133th articles of the Criminal Law, such hot issues as "driving drunk into the crime" and so on, are discussed. This paper discusses the localization of the free behavior of cause.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D914

【相似文献】