坦白制度司法适用疑难问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-18 01:26

本文选题：坦白　切入点：被动到案　出处：《内蒙古大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：《刑法修正案(八)》将“坦白从宽”正式纳入我国刑事法律制度,标志着我国量刑制度的进一步完善,法治进程实现了又一步跨越。但是,在刑事审判工作实践中,由于缺乏相应的制度规范,“坦白从宽”在司法适用中遇到诸多困难。如对主体的认定、对被动到案的认定、对如实交待的认定、对避免特别严重后果的认定等方面在实践和理论上都存在着争论的空间,对该制度的应用产生了直接影响。相对自首制度,坦白对刑事被告人的量刑而言始终只是个幅度较小的从宽情节,修正后的刑法并没有对坦白情节在刑事案件中的认定和量刑等适用做出明确的规定,目前司法解释亦无涉及此项内容,《刑法》第六十七条在实践中出现不同的理解与适用,导致同一法律条款的多元化应用,影响了法律适用的一致性和权威性,统一认识、规范应用坦白制度成为摆在当前亟待解决的重要问题。作者试图通过研究《刑法修正案(八)》公布以来,坦白制度的司法适用和学界的理论观点,博彩众长,寻找推进刑法第六十七条适用更科学的路径,从司法解释的角度提出有助于坦白制度完善的具体建议,以期健全该制度,为司法工作人员处置坦白情节提供评价标准,同时,确保对被告人罚当其罪,进而更加合理地保障被告人的合法权益,最终实现节省司法资源与保障当事人权益的双赢。
[Abstract]:The amendment of the Criminal Law (8) formally brings "Tan-Bai leniency" into the criminal legal system of our country, which marks the further improvement of the sentencing system in our country and the realization of another step forward in the process of the rule of law. However, in the practice of criminal trial, Due to the lack of corresponding institutional norms, there are many difficulties in the application of justice, such as the confirmation of the subject, the confirmation of the passive to the case, the confirmation of truthfulness. There is room for debate in practice and in theory on the determination of the avoidance of particularly serious consequences, which has a direct impact on the application of the system. Confessions on the sentencing of criminal defendants are always only a relatively small lenient scenario, the amended Criminal Law does not make clear provisions on the application of confessions in criminal cases, such as the determination of confession circumstances and sentencing, etc. At present, there is no such content in the judicial interpretation. Article 67th of the Criminal Law has different understanding and application in practice, which leads to the pluralistic application of the same legal provisions, which affects the consistency and authority of the application of the law and the unity of understanding. Standardizing the application of the confession system has become an important problem to be solved urgently. The author tries to study the judicial application of the confession system and the academic theory point of view since the publication of the Criminal Law Amendment (8). To find a more scientific way to promote the application of Article 67th of Criminal Law, and to put forward some concrete suggestions from the angle of judicial interpretation to perfect the confession system, in order to perfect the system, to provide the evaluation standard for the judicial staff to deal with the confession circumstances, at the same time, To ensure the punishment of the defendant as its crime, and then more reasonable protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the defendant, and ultimately achieve a win-win situation of saving judicial resources and protecting the rights and interests of the parties.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.1

【参考文献】