论敲诈勒索罪与寻衅滋事罪的界分

发布时间：2018-03-18 09:36

本文选题：寻衅滋事罪　切入点：敲诈勒索罪　出处：《江西社会科学》2015年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：敲诈勒索罪与寻衅滋事罪中强拿硬要或者任意占用公私财物的行为类型存在着交集,我们可从行为人侵害的主要客体、犯罪的实施场所、有无明确的犯罪计划、犯罪对象是否特定等方面进行区分。当我们无法从客观要件区分两罪时,不能将主观目的要素作为区分两罪的绝对标准,此时按想象竞合犯的处罚原则从一重处断更能达到罪责刑相适应的原则。据此,敲诈他人财产未达数额较大标准,但严重扰乱社会秩序行为可构成寻衅滋事罪;而强拿硬要他人财产数额巨大,同时严重扰乱社会秩序的行为,如果以敲诈勒索罪论处更能体现罪责刑相适应原则时,也可以定敲诈勒索罪。
[Abstract]:There is an intersection between the crime of extortion and the crime of provoking trouble and disturbance. There is an intersection of the types of behavior in which the public or private property is forcibly used or arbitrarily occupied. We can see whether there is a clear criminal plan from the main object infringed upon by the perpetrator, the place where the crime is committed, and whether there is a clear criminal plan, When we can not distinguish two crimes from objective elements, we can not take the subjective objective element as the absolute criterion to distinguish the two crimes. At this time, according to the principle of punishment of imaginative co-occurrences, it is more possible to achieve the principle of adaptation of crime, responsibility and punishment. According to this principle, extortion of other people's property does not reach the larger standard, but serious disturbance of social order can constitute a crime of provoking and causing trouble. However, if the crime of extortion and extortion can reflect the principle of adaptation of crime and punishment, the crime of extortion can also be convicted of extortion when the amount of property of others is huge and the behavior of seriously disrupting social order is seriously disturbed by the crime of extortion.
【作者单位】：河南大学犯罪控制与刑事政策研究所;河南大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“我国有组织犯罪的企业化趋势与刑事治理对策研究”(14BFX045) 2015年度“河南省高校科技创新人才支持计划(人文社科类)”
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】