盗窃罪未遂研究

发布时间：2018-03-18 13:18

本文选题：盗窃罪未遂　切入点：数额　出处：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文以新近出台的司法解释1为契机，在宏观把握盗窃罪未遂基础之上，区分具体类型对盗窃罪的未遂问题展开分析，以期对盗窃罪的司法适用和立法完善助力。文章遵循从宏观研究到具体分析的研究脉络，打破“一概而论”、“一刀切”的传统立场，坚持在同一罪名之下，就数额型、多次型、其他类型的盗窃罪是否存在未遂形态、各自成立未遂的条件如何等问题分而论之。文章共约三万八千字，分以下几个部分：第一部分就盗窃罪未遂的基础理论进行简要分析，从宏观角度分析盗窃罪未遂的范围，并以“相对优势控制”理论作为既未遂状态的判断标准。第二部分对数额型盗窃罪未遂展开论述，，将犯罪数额准确定性为非独立的构成要件要素并融于犯罪构成客观要件中理解，强调在成立犯罪的基础上再行判断是否存在未遂形态，并具体区分为数额较大型、数额（特别）巨大型盗窃罪进行具体认定。第三部分就多次型盗窃罪的未遂问题进行阐述。首先明确多次盗窃的认定，其中盗窃的行为标准定性为行政违法程度，并论及自然意义上的未遂对多次盗窃成立及其犯罪未遂的影响；其次对多次型盗窃罪是否存在犯罪未遂进行研究，强调从主客观相统一的角度理解数额的性质；最后，就刑事处罚与行政处罚的衔接问题展开叙述，分析了多次违法行为上升为犯罪行为的机理。第四部分就其他类型盗窃罪的未遂问题进行分析。在明确数额对其定罪量刑的意义之后，文章主张对入户盗窃、携带凶器盗窃、扒窃进行严格限制解释，处理好盗窃未遂情形下刑事处罚与行政处罚的衔接问题。文章指出，尽管其他类型的盗窃罪只对数额提出了较低要求，仍考虑从结果犯意义上理解其犯罪未遂问题，并借助着手、得逞等基本概念具体认定未遂的成立。
[Abstract]:Taking the newly introduced judicial explanation 1 as the turning point, on the basis of macroscopically grasping the attempted larceny, this paper distinguishes the specific types of the attempted larceny and analyzes the problem of the attempted larceny. In order to help the judicial application and legislative perfection of larceny, the article follows the research thread from macroscopic research to concrete analysis, breaks the traditional position of "generality" and "one-size-fits-all", and insists on the number type and multiple types under the same charge. Whether the other types of larceny has attempted form, and how the conditions of their establishment attempt. The article is about 38,000 words, divided into the following parts:. The first part makes a brief analysis of the basic theory of attempted larceny, analyzes the scope of attempted larceny from a macro point of view, and takes the theory of "control of relative advantage" as the criterion of judging the state of attempted larceny. The second part discusses the attempted larceny of the amount type, and defines the amount of the crime as a non-independent element of the constituent elements, which is understood in the objective elements of the constitution of the crime. It is emphasized that on the basis of the establishment of the crime, the existence of attempted form should be judged again, and it can be divided into two categories: the amount is larger, the amount (especially) the grand larceny, and the crime of larceny is determined concretely. The third part expounds the problem of attempted multiple larceny. First of all, it clarifies the identification of multiple theft, in which the behavior standard of theft is defined as the degree of administrative illegality. It also discusses the impact of attempted theft in the natural sense on the establishment of multiple theft and its attempted crime. Secondly, it studies whether there is attempted crime in the crime of multiple larceny, and emphasizes the understanding of the nature of the amount from the perspective of unity of subjectivity and objectivity. This paper narrates the connection between criminal punishment and administrative punishment, and analyzes the mechanism that many illegal acts rise to criminal behavior. Part 4th analyzes the attempted problem of other types of larceny. After determining the significance of the conviction and sentencing of the crime, the article advocates strict restriction and interpretation of burglary, armed theft and pickpocketing. The article points out that although other types of larceny only require a lower amount of money, it is still considered to understand the problem of attempted crime in the sense of resultant crime. And with the help of the basic concepts, such as successful identification of the establishment of the specific attempt.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.35

【参考文献】