虚假诉讼罪的法律适用

发布时间：2018-03-18 19:41

本文选题：虚假诉讼　切入点：主体范围　出处：《延边大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着社会关系的复杂化,人们之间的矛盾也越来越多,而解决矛盾的方式也多样化。我国公民的法律意识也逐渐提高,当自己的权利受到侵犯时,会通过诉讼等法律途径维护自身权益。然而,一些行为人却企图利用法律作为自己获取非法利益的工具,实施虚假诉讼行为,这种行为具有严重社会危害性。虚假诉讼罪作为《刑法修正案(九)》中新规定的罪名,法官对其法律适用存在许多不同的认识。本文通过对欧宝公司与特莱维公司虚假诉讼案的分析列出本案的争议焦点:一是特莱维公司是否是适格的主体;二是两家公司的行为是否构成虚假诉讼罪;三是从上述案例中引出,在法律实践中,虚假诉讼罪的适用问题:如对虚假诉讼罪主体范围的理解不统一问题,除了提起诉讼的原告之外,恶意串通的被告及第三人是否构成虚假诉讼罪主体;对妨害司法秩序的程度无法把握的问题,虚假诉讼罪在妨害司法秩序方面为行为犯,但妨害秩序达到何种程度才能构成虚假诉讼罪;严重侵害他人合法权益不易认定的问题,对于达到何种程度才能视为"严重"尚未有具体标准,这也是造成司法实务混乱的原因之一。围绕上述三个问题,关于虚假诉讼罪在法律适用方面笔者提出几点建议:对于虚假诉讼罪主体范围的理解不统一的问题,笔者认为,法律适用过程中应对本罪的主体范围作宽泛理解与适用,即以提起诉讼的原告、恶意串通的被告、有独立请求权的第三人作为虚假诉讼罪的主体;对于妨害司法秩序的程度无法把握的问题,笔者认为,妨害司法秩序应以案件进入实质性审理程序为准;对于严重侵害他人合法权益不易认定的问题,侵财型虚假诉讼行为以一定数额的侵财结果为严重侵害他人合法权益。通过以上分析,可以对虚假诉讼罪的内涵、特征及危害性有所了解,同时可以认识虚假诉讼罪在法律适用中存在的问题,并探讨对这些问题的解决对策。
[Abstract]:With the complication of social relations, there are more and more contradictions among people, and the ways to solve them are also diversified. Our citizens' legal consciousness is also gradually raised, when their rights are violated, Will protect their own rights and interests through legal channels such as litigation. However, some perpetrators attempt to use the law as a tool to obtain illegal interests and to carry out false litigation. Such acts have serious social harmfulness. The crime of false litigation is a new crime stipulated in the Criminal Law Amendment (9). The judge has many different views on the application of the law. This paper analyzes the false lawsuit between Opel and Trevor and lists the controversial focus of the case: first, whether Trevor is the appropriate subject; The second is whether the behavior of the two companies constitutes the crime of false litigation, and the third is that the application of the crime of false litigation in the legal practice, such as the inconsistent understanding of the scope of the subject of the crime of false litigation, is derived from the cases mentioned above. In addition to the plaintiff who brought the lawsuit, whether the defendant and the third party of malicious collusion constitute the subject of the crime of false litigation; the question of whether the degree of obstruction of the judicial order cannot be grasped, the crime of false litigation is an act offence in the aspect of impairing the judicial order, However, there is no specific standard as to the extent to which obstruction of order can constitute the crime of false litigation, and the problem of serious infringement on the legitimate rights and interests of others is not easy to identify, and to what extent can they be regarded as "serious"? This is also one of the causes of confusion in judicial practice. Around the above three problems, the author puts forward several suggestions on the application of the law of the crime of false litigation: the understanding of the scope of the subject of the crime of false litigation is not uniform, the author thinks that, In the process of applying the law, the subject scope of this crime should be widely understood and applied, that is, the plaintiff who brought the lawsuit, the defendant who colluded maliciously, the third person with independent claim right as the subject of false lawsuit; As for the problem that the degree of obstruction of judicial order cannot be grasped, the author believes that the obstruction of judicial order should be based on the substantive trial procedure of the case; for the serious infringement of the legitimate rights and interests of others, it is difficult to identify, Through the above analysis, we can understand the connotation, characteristics and harmfulness of the crime of false litigation. At the same time, we can understand the problems existing in the application of the law of the crime of false litigation, and discuss the countermeasures to solve these problems.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】