中国共同犯罪立法模式的归属与选择——“双层递进式”共犯立法模式的提倡

发布时间：2018-03-19 04:27

本文选题：统一制正犯立法模式　切入点：区分制共犯立法模式　出处：《政法论丛》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：当今世界各国关于共同犯罪的立法可以归结为统一制正犯立法模式与区分制共犯立法模式两大类型。中国共同犯罪立法模式在解释论上应当归属于统一制正犯立法模式。相比较而言,区分制共犯立法模式具有更大的优越性,与中国现行共同犯罪理论与实践也具有更多的共通性,因而,从应然的角度看,中国应当采用区分制共犯立法模式。在传统区分制立法模式下,由于正犯承载着定罪与量刑的双重功能,出现了"正犯理论的实质化"倾向,这种倾向暗含着破坏刑事法治的风险,因而在立法论上应当采用"双层递进式"共犯立法模式。"双层递进式"共犯立法模式根据分工分类将共犯区分为组织犯、实行犯、教唆犯和帮助犯,根据作用分类将共犯区分为主犯和从犯;分工分类解决犯罪参与人的定罪问题,作用分类解决犯罪参与人的量刑问题,分工分类与作用分类的结合很好的解决了犯罪参与人刑事责任的有无及其程度问题。在"双层递进式"立法模式下,可以根据犯罪事实支配理论来区分主犯与从犯。
[Abstract]:The legislation on joint crime in various countries in the world can be divided into two types: the unified principal offender legislation model and the differentiated accomplice legislation model. The Chinese joint crime legislation model should belong to the unified system principal offender legislation model in the interpretation theory. Mode of law. By comparison, The legislative model of differentiated accomplice has more advantages, and has more commonality with the current theory and practice of joint crime in China. China should adopt the differentiated accomplice legislation model. Under the traditional differentiated legislation mode, the principal offender has the tendency of "substantial crime theory" because of its dual function of conviction and sentencing. This tendency implies the risk of destroying the criminal rule of law, so we should adopt the "double progressive" mode of accomplice legislation in the legislative theory, and divide the accomplice into organizational crimes and carry out crimes according to the classification of division of labor. An abettor and an aider shall, according to the classification of their roles, divide accomplices into principal and accomplice; divide the division of labor to solve the problem of conviction of the participants in the crime, and solve the sentencing problems of the participants in the crime according to the classification of the roles, The combination of division of labor classification and function classification has solved the problem of criminal liability of criminal participant and its degree. In the "double progressive" legislative model, the principal offender and the accessory can be distinguished according to the theory of the domination of criminal facts.
【作者单位】：山东大学法学院;
【基金】：2011年国家社科基金后期资助项目《刑事政策与刑法关系论》(11FFX014)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924

【相似文献】