全球化背景下洗钱罪争议问题探析

发布时间：2018-03-19 07:24

本文选题：洗钱罪　切入点：原生本犯　出处：《河北法学》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国反洗钱立法肇始于1990年全国人大常委会通过的《关于禁毒的决定》,发展至今,反洗钱法律体系已初步形成,基本满足了国际公约有关反洗钱的立法要求,但围绕洗钱罪的相关争议却未消解。在洗钱罪主体问题上,将原生罪本犯排除在洗钱罪主体之外,具有充分的法理依据;且在范围上,原生罪本犯应仅限于实行犯,不包括教唆犯和帮助犯。在洗钱罪主观要件问题上,不应将间接故意排除在洗钱罪之外,但无论如何过失不能构成洗钱罪;关于洗钱罪中"明知"是否包括"应当知道"的争论应到此为止;当前,在洗钱罪"明知"司法认定上的关键问题应当是如何寻求科学界定"应当知道"的具体方法和路径。
[Abstract]:The anti-money laundering legislation of our country began with the "decision on Drug Control" adopted by the standing Committee of the National people's Congress in 1990. Up to now, the anti-money laundering legal system has been initially formed, which basically meets the legislative requirements of the international conventions on anti-money laundering. However, the disputes surrounding the crime of money laundering have not been resolved. On the subject of the crime of money laundering, it has sufficient legal basis to exclude the original crime from the subject of the crime of money laundering, and to the extent, the original crime of the original crime should only be restricted to the carrying out of the crime. Not including abettor and aider. On the subjective elements of money laundering crime, indirect intention should not be excluded from the crime of money laundering, but in any case negligence cannot constitute the crime of money laundering; The debate on whether "knowing" includes "should know" in the crime of money laundering should end here; at present, the key problem in the judicial determination of "knowing" in the crime of money laundering should be how to find the concrete method and path to scientifically define "should know".
【作者单位】：河南科技大学法学院;
【基金】：2016年度河南省法学会研究课题《刑事案件诉裁机制研究》(HNLS(2016)A16)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】