基于介入因素对客观归因与客观归责的区分考察

发布时间：2018-03-19 17:14

本文选题：因果关系　切入点：归因　出处：《中国检察官》2016年12期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：因果关系是一种引起和被引起的关系。因果观念是人类对客观世界认识而形成的最古老的观念之一。在哲学上,原因和结果是揭示现象之间相互联系的一个方面或一种形式的哲学范畴:在刑法教义学上,因果关系分为存在论意义上的因果关系与规范论意义上的因果关系。存在论意义上的因果关系即客观归因,规范论意义上的因果关系即客观归责,存在论意义上的因果关系是规范论意义上的因果关系的前提。存在论意义上的因果关系采用具有一般性的条件说进行判断,规范论意义上的因果关系采用客观归责理论进行判断,在介入因素存在的情况下,笔者认为应当将存在论意义上的因果关系与规范论意义上的因果关系加以区分,有存在论意义上的因果关系并不等于要承担刑事责任,还要进行规范论意义上的客观归责的判断。
[Abstract]:Causality is a relationship between cause and effect. The concept of causality is one of the oldest concepts formed by human beings' understanding of the objective world. Causes and consequences are an aspect or a form of philosophical category that reveals the interconnectedness of phenomena: in the dogmatics of criminal law, Causality is divided into causality in the sense of existentialism and causality in the sense of normalism, namely objective attribution in the sense of existentialism, and objective imputation in the sense of norm. The causality in the sense of ontology is the premise of causality in the sense of normality, and the causality in the sense of existentialism is judged by the theory of general conditions. The causality in the sense of normality is judged by objective imputation theory. Under the condition of the existence of intervention factors, the author thinks that the causality in the sense of ontology should be distinguished from the causality in the sense of normalism. The causality in the sense of existentialism does not mean to bear criminal responsibility, but also to judge the objective imputation of responsibility in the sense of normative theory.
【作者单位】：北京市昌平区人民检察院;
【分类号】：D914

【相似文献】