当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

危险驾驶罪刑罚问题研究

发布时间:2018-03-21 13:01

  本文选题:危险驾驶罪 切入点:新社会防卫运动 出处:《内蒙古大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:2011年2月25日第十一届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十九次会议审议的《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(八)》将危险驾驶行为纳入我国刑法,之后的相关司法解释将危险驾驶行为确定为危险驾驶罪。危险驾驶入刑改变了过去“肇事后再处罚”的做法,充分表明国家对严厉打击危险驾驶行为的态度和决心,也引起了社会的广泛关注。但是,此罪名的刑罚设置成了我国刑罚体系中最为特殊的一个,仅判处拘役,并处罚金。该罪独特的刑罚设置造成了诸多关于刑罚适用的问题,进而,需要对该罪刑罚问题进行研究。 上世纪五十年代在西方国家兴起了以法国的马克·安赛尔教授为代表的新社会防卫运动。该运动的主导思想是开展“非犯罪化”、“非刑事化”的人道主义刑事运动,提出刑罚目的不在于惩罚,而在于社会教育,通过刑罚的方式使犯罪人重新社会化,进而达到防卫社会的目的,并坚决反对短期监禁刑。但是我国刑法将危险驾驶罪刑种设置为拘役,恰恰属于短期自由刑的一种。因此需要从新社会防卫运动的视角探讨危险驾驶罪的刑罚问题。 本文共分三大部分。 第一部分是关于危险驾驶罪的概述,阐明危险驾驶入罪的立法沿革、入罪理由,进而引出危险驾驶罪刑罚设置的独特性。危险驾驶罪的刑罚表述“处拘役,并处罚金”,从这短短的七个字中可以看出危险驾驶罪的刑罚设置为拘役刑加罚金刑的一种组合方式。这种单一的刑罚设置成为危险驾驶罪刑罚最为独特的地方。 第二部分是从新社会防卫运动的视角审视危险驾驶罪刑罚方面存在的问题。该部分从“新社会防卫论”的主要观点出发,阐述“新社会防卫运动”对刑罚改革的建议,并以该运动的视角来具体分析危险驾驶罪刑罚设置存在的弊端,通过对危险驾驶罪个案的实证研究,指出危险驾驶罪拘役刑在实际执行过程中存在的问题。 第三部分在阐述了马克·安塞尔的“新社会防卫论”的主要观点,具体分析危险驾驶罪刑罚存在的问题后,本文认为在现行刑法关于危险驾驶罪结构的情况下,解决危险驾驶罪刑罚存在的问题应当从刑罚设置、刑罚裁量、刑罚执行三方面进行完善。
[Abstract]:The Amendment to the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China (8), which was considered at the 19th session of the standing Committee of the 11th National people's Congress on February 25th 2011, incorporated dangerous driving behavior into our criminal law. The relevant judicial explanations later defined dangerous driving behavior as a dangerous driving offence. Dangerous driving punishment changed the past practice of "punishing after causing an accident", which fully demonstrated the state's attitude and determination to severely crack down on dangerous driving behavior. However, the penalty for this crime has become the most special one in the penalty system of our country, only sentenced to criminal detention and fined. The unique penalty setup of this crime has caused many problems about the application of the penalty. Furthermore, it is necessary to study the penalty of the crime. In -50s, a new social defense movement, represented by Professor Mark Ansel of France, emerged in Western countries. The main idea of the movement was to launch a humanitarian criminal movement of "decriminalization" and "decriminalization". It is pointed out that the purpose of punishment is not to punish, but to educate the society, to resocialize the criminal by means of punishment, and to achieve the goal of defending the society. But our criminal law sets the crime of dangerous driving as criminal detention, which is just one kind of short-term free punishment. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss the penalty of dangerous driving from the perspective of the new social defense movement. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is the summary of dangerous driving crime, expounding the legislative evolution of dangerous driving incrimination, the reason of incrimination, and the uniqueness of penalty setting of dangerous driving crime. From these short words, we can see that the penalty of dangerous driving is a combination of criminal detention and fine, and this kind of single penalty has become the most unique place for dangerous driving. The second part is to examine the problems existing in the penalty of dangerous driving crime from the perspective of the New Social Defense Movement, which expounds the suggestions of the New Social Defense Movement on the reform of penalty from the main point of view of the "New Social Defense Theory". And from the perspective of the movement to concretely analyze the drawbacks of the penalty set of dangerous driving crime, through the case of dangerous driving crime empirical study, pointed out the dangerous driving crime of criminal detention in the actual implementation of the existing problems. In the third part, after expounding the main viewpoints of Mark Ansel's "New Social Defense Theory," and analyzing the problems in the penalty of dangerous driving crime, the author thinks that in the current criminal law about the structure of dangerous driving crime, To solve the problems existing in the penalty of dangerous driving crime, we should perfect it from three aspects: penalty setting, penalty discretion and penalty execution.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 赵秉志;张磊;;“酒驾”危害行为的刑法立法对策[J];法学杂志;2009年12期

2 曲新久;;醉驾不一律入罪无需依赖于“但书”的适用[J];法学;2011年07期

3 尹晓静;;刑事政策与新社会防卫论——浅评卢建平教授《刑事政策与刑法》[J];法制与社会;2008年17期

4 梁根林;;“醉驾”入刑后的定罪困扰与省思[J];法学;2013年03期

5 何荣功;罗继洲;;也论抽象危险犯的构造与刑法“但书”之关系——以危险驾驶罪为引例[J];法学评论;2013年05期

6 王宇明;;论危险驾驶罪的刑罚设置[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年11期

7 张明楷;;危险驾驶的刑事责任[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2009年06期

8 王冲;;论危险驾驶的实害犯——兼论刑法第133条之1第2款的不足与完善[J];江西教育学院学报;2012年02期

9 孟U,

本文编号:1643960


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1643960.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户55705***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com