交通肇事罪共犯问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-23 16:52

本文选题：交通肇事罪　切入点：共同犯罪　出处：《中国海洋大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：在我国,无论是主流的刑法学界理论观点还是我国的刑事立法规定都支持“犯罪共同说”,否认过失犯罪中共同犯罪的成立。交通肇事罪作为最为典型的过失犯罪,当然也就不可能存在共同犯罪一说。然而,最高院出台的有关交通肇事罪共同犯罪的《解释》却与我国刑法规定以及主流的共同犯罪理论之间存在一定的分歧和对立,引发了刑法理论界对于交通肇事罪能否构成共犯问题的广泛争论。这既不利于维护刑法的权威性,同时也损害了我国法制体系的科学严谨性。本文旨在严格依据现行刑法规定,依托主流共同犯罪理论,对交通肇事罪进行分析,并提出一些可行性的刑法完善建议。论文大致可以分为三个部分。第一部分主要介绍交通肇事罪在我国的萌芽以及发展历史,以及英美法系关于交通肇事类犯罪的规定,了解交通肇事罪的历史演变进程。接着从犯罪构成要件方面入手,分别从交通肇事罪的主体、主观方面、客体和客观方面四个犯罪构成要素方面全面阐述交通肇事罪。本文第二部分着重介绍了最高院的相关《解释》与刑法典的冲突之处,并分析了我国刑法学界的主流共同犯罪理论;接着在现行刑法和共同犯罪理论的基础上对我国交通肇事罪中有关共同犯罪的内容进行重新审视,将交通肇事分为“单纯指使违章驾驶交通肇事”情形、“单纯指使逃逸”情形以及“既指使违章驾驶交通肇事后又指使逃逸”三种情形进行分析,并就三种不同情况是否构成共同犯罪进行理论上的探讨与分析,提出不同的处理解决办法。第三部分的主要内容是就我国交通肇事罪有关共同犯罪问题提出一些法律上的修订建议。主要包括有增设肇事后逃逸罪、对最高院的相关《解释》的不和谐部分进行适当的删除修订、吸收借鉴英美法系有关交通肇事罪的合理内容比如引入“驾驶者”理念等等,希望能够为中国有关交通肇事罪的立法提供一点帮助。
[Abstract]:In our country, both the mainstream theory of criminal law and the provisions of criminal legislation support the "joint crime theory" and deny the establishment of joint crime in negligent crime. Traffic accident crime is the most typical negligent crime. Of course, it is impossible to say that there is a joint crime. However, the interpretation of the traffic accident crime jointly issued by the Supreme Court has certain differences and opposites with the provisions of our country's criminal law and the mainstream theory of joint crime. It not only does not help to maintain the authority of the criminal law, but also damages the scientific rigor of the legal system of our country. Based on the common crime theory, this paper analyzes the traffic accident crime and puts forward some feasible suggestions for the improvement of criminal law. The paper can be divided into three parts. The first part mainly introduces the rudimentary and developing history of traffic accident crime in our country, as well as the regulation of traffic accident crime in Anglo-American law system, and understands the historical evolution process of traffic accident crime. Traffic accident crime from the main body, subjective aspect, object and objective aspects of the four constituent elements of the crime comprehensively elaborated traffic accident crime. The second part of this paper mainly introduces the conflict between the Supreme Court and the Criminal Code, and analyzes the mainstream theory of joint crime in the criminal law circle of our country. Then, on the basis of the current criminal law and the theory of joint crime, we re-examine the contents of the joint crime in our country's traffic accident crime. The traffic accident is divided into three situations: "simply directing illegal driving", "simply directing escape" and "instructing illegal driving after hit-and-run" to analyze the situation. It also discusses and analyzes whether the three different situations constitute joint crime in theory and puts forward different solutions. The main content of the third part is to put forward some legal revision suggestions on the joint crime of traffic accident crime in our country. It mainly includes the crime of escaping after adding the crime of hit-and-run. Appropriate deletion and revision of the disharmonious part of the relevant interpretation of the Supreme Court, to absorb and learn from the reasonable contents of the common law system on traffic accident crimes, such as the introduction of the "driver" concept, and so on. I hope to be able to provide a little help for the legislation of traffic accident crime in China.
【学位授予单位】：中国海洋大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】