污染环境罪法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-25 02:26

本文选题：污染环境罪　切入点：过失犯　出处：《苏州大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：污染环境罪,指的是违反防治环境污染相关法律法规,进而造成后果严重的环境污染问题,依照法律应予以刑事处罚的行为。本研究首先明确了对污染环境罪进行研究的背景、意义和现状,确定了研究的方向,即就污染环境罪实施过程中出现的问题进行分析,并提出可行的解决办法。1997年,《中华人民共和国刑法》明文规定了“重大环境污染事故罪”;2011年,《刑法修正案(八)》扩大了污染对象范围、污染物范围、入罪范围,将其修订为“污染环境罪”;2013年,两高公布《关于办理环境污染刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》,明确规定了污染环境罪的定罪标准以及结果加重情节。已有一些研究针对污染环境罪立法过程中存在的问题进行了分析,但其实施的司法过程并未得到高度关注。本文总结当前污染环境罪的实施现状,发现该罪名在实施过程中存在主观要件不清、客观要件缺失、因果关系难证、定罪量刑适用、共同犯罪认定等问题,文章对这些问题进行了详细的分析和梳理,并结合已审结的经典案例,针对性地一一提出解决的办法,包括:分别明确过失犯和故意犯、由结果犯转变为危险犯、调校因果关系证明标准、多元化原则加大刑罚力度、公平合理处罚共同犯罪。
[Abstract]:Environmental pollution crime refers to the act of violating laws and regulations related to the prevention and control of environmental pollution and causing serious environmental pollution problems, which should be criminally punished in accordance with the law. The significance and current situation of the study, namely, the analysis of the problems in the process of carrying out the crime of pollution of the environment, In 1997, the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China explicitly stipulated the "crime of major environmental pollution accidents", and in 2011, the Criminal Law Amendment (8) expanded the scope of pollution objects, the scope of pollutants, and the scope of criminalization. To amend it to "pollution of the environment"; in 2013, The two high schools published "explanation on some problems of applicable Law in dealing with Environmental pollution Criminal case", which clearly defined the standard of conviction and the aggravating circumstances of the result of the crime of pollution of the environment. Some studies have been done on the legislative process of the crime of pollution of the environment. The existing problems are analyzed. However, the judicial process of its implementation has not been highly concerned. This paper summarizes the current situation of the implementation of environmental pollution crime, and finds that the subjective elements of the crime are unclear, the objective elements are missing, the causality is difficult to prove, and the conviction and sentencing is applicable. The article makes a detailed analysis and combing of these problems, and combines the classical cases that have been completed, and puts forward the solutions one by one, including: defining the negligent crime and intentional crime, respectively. From resultant crime to dangerous crime, adjust the standard of causality proof, increase the penalty intensity of pluralism principle, and punish the joint crime fairly and reasonably.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】