污染环境犯罪因果关系的证明

发布时间：2018-03-25 19:38

本文选题：污染环境犯罪　切入点：因果关系　出处：《政治与法律》2017年12期

【摘要】：在我国环境污染犯罪治理的现实背景下,污染环境犯罪因果关系的证明和认定,存在规范和事实层面上的各种难题。污染环境犯罪的技术治理,需要在其因果关系的事实意义基础上,从刑法实体规范、价值立场衡量以及司法程序的证据和证明意义来加以考察。明确污染环境犯罪因果关系的证明是一种混合严格证明与自由证明的分层证明。它属于法证据学的概念范畴,需要精细的法证据学和诉讼程序的规范指引;需要法官居中进行自由心证裁量并做出裁决;需要在污染环境刑法及其司法解释中找寻相关的证明对象和范围;需要注重证明的立体化背景和技术工具的综合应用与整体判断。它的证明度要求为确定性或者相对确定性,结果要求为证实结果与证伪结果。最终,在污染环境犯罪技术治理的背景下,要求对其因果关系的证明进行扩展。
[Abstract]:Under the realistic background of environmental pollution crime control in our country, the proof and determination of causality of pollution environmental crime, there are various problems on the level of norm and fact. On the basis of the factual significance of its causality, the substantive norms of criminal law should be established. The proof of causality of pollution crime is a kind of stratified proof of mixed strict proof and free proof. It belongs to the concept category of forensic evidence. It needs fine legal evidential science and normative guidance of litigation procedure; it needs the judge to center the discretion of evidence and make a decision; it needs to look for the relevant object and scope of proof in the criminal law of polluting environment and its judicial interpretation. It is necessary to pay attention to the comprehensive application and the whole judgment of the three-dimensional background of proof and the technical tool. Its proof degree requires certainty or relative certainty, and the result must be the result of proof and falsification. Under the background of technical control of environmental crime, the causality should be extended.
【作者单位】：西南财经大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“刑事庭审证据调查规则研究”(项目编号:16AFX012)之阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.36

【相似文献】