论罪刑法定原则的中国困境与出路

发布时间：2018-03-26 09:10

本文选题：罪刑法定主义　切入点：明确性原则　出处：《重庆大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：罪刑法定原则作为刑法的基本原则，它在刑事法治领域占有重要的地位，本文以罪刑法定主义的基本内涵与精神为主线，联系我国当前的法治建设现状，归结出罪刑法定主义在我国法制运行中的困境及其原因，通过研究学习两大法系的法律制度，结合我国的政治法律环境提出了具有针对性的一些对策。本文的正文部分主要包括五个方面。第一部分，引言首先指出了本文的写作背景，即“国家尊重和保障人权”已经写入宪法，然后，点出了本文的写作目的，即实现罪刑法定原则保障人权的目的。第二部分，主要介绍了罪刑法定原则的中国困境。从罪刑法定原则的明确性要求、确定性要求和实体的适当原则三个方面详细分析了罪刑法定原则在刑事法治中的缺憾，，即罪刑法定原则的本土困境。第三部分，主要是对罪刑法定原则中国困境的原因进行了条理性分析。在刑事法治中缺乏保障罪刑法定原则健康运行的配套制度是造成中国困境的基本原因；罪刑法定原则的明确性要求与刑法体系的开放性之间存在矛盾是导致中国困境的技术原因；对罪刑法定原则的内涵和精神的误读是造成中国困境的最重要原因。第四部分，主要是针对上述问题提出了罪刑法定原则中国困境的对策。首先，要树立罪刑法定原则的新理念，努力实现刑事法治；其次，在司法实践中要充分发挥法官的主观能动性，即实行刑罚个别化和建立以法官为主的刑法解释机制；最后，建议在我国构建刑事判例制度，以解决罪刑法定原则的明确性困境。第五部分，主要是对罪刑法定原则中国困境的认识与思考。
[Abstract]:As the basic principle of criminal law, the principle of legality of a crime occupies an important position in the field of criminal law. This paper, taking the basic connotation and spirit of legality of crime as the main line, links the current situation of the construction of the rule of law in our country. By studying the legal system of the two legal systems and combining with the political and legal environment of our country, this paper puts forward some countermeasures. The text of this paper mainly includes five aspects. In the first part, the foreword points out the writing background of this article, that is, "the state respects and protects human rights", and then points out the writing purpose of this article, that is, to realize the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime to protect human rights. The second part mainly introduces the Chinese predicament of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime, and analyzes in detail the defects of the principle of legality of a specified crime in the criminal law from three aspects: the requirement of clarity, the requirement of certainty and the principle of entity. Namely, the local predicament of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime. The third part mainly analyzes the reasons of the dilemma of the principle of legality of a crime in China. The lack of supporting system to guarantee the healthy operation of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime is the basic cause of the dilemma in China. The contradiction between the clarity of the principle of legality of a crime and the openness of the criminal law system is the technical reason leading to China's predicament, and the misreading of the connotation and spirit of the principle of legality of a crime is the most important cause of the plight of China. In the fourth part, the author puts forward the countermeasures of the dilemma of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime in China. Firstly, it is necessary to set up a new concept of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime and strive to realize the rule of criminal law. In judicial practice, we should give full play to the subjective initiative of judges, that is, to carry out the individualization of punishment and to establish a criminal law interpretation mechanism based on judges. Finally, it is suggested that the system of criminal precedents should be established in our country in order to solve the dilemma of clarity of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime. The fifth part is the understanding and thinking about the dilemma of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime in China.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.1

【参考文献】