“醉酒型”危险驾驶罪问题探究
发布时间:2018-03-28 01:35
本文选题:醉驾行为 切入点:构成要件 出处:《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:“醉酒型”危险驾驶罪指的是行为人醉酒在道路上驾驶机动车辆的行为。在“醉酒型”危险驾驶罪的客观方面中,对于“醉酒标准”的认定除了主要根据国家标准来认定之外,当对行为人检测的血液中的酒精含量尚且没有达到规定的醉酒的标准,但行为人的状态却很明显已经醉酒或者说当执法人员在有些情况下没有条件对行为人运用呼气或抽血两种检测方式进行检测时,就需要采用其他辅助检测方法;对于“道路”的认定则需要道路具备公共性和公众性两个特征;“机动车”还需要根据国家现有的规定来认定,而不应该随意扩大机动车的范围,这样才符合社会的情况;而“驾驶行为”的认定则需要行为人操作机动车使之运动起来才可以认定为驾驶行为。另外,醉驾实施者在主观层面上应该是间接故意。“醉驾行为”不应该一律入罪,《刑法》第十三条的但书规定对于本罪是有效力的。最后对于本罪与交通肇事罪及以危险方法危害公共安全罪的界限问题,应该从三罪的主观方面、客观方面以及罪过形态等方面加以区分,尤其是本罪与以危险方法危害公共安全罪,还应该考虑犯罪行为的危险性程度问题。由此科学合理的判断行为人所实施的犯罪行为应该以何种罪名定罪处罚。
[Abstract]:The crime of "drunken" dangerous driving refers to the behavior of the doer driving a motorized vehicle on the road when drunk. In the objective aspect of the crime of "drunken" dangerous driving, the identification of "drunken standard" is not only determined according to the national standard, but also according to the national standard. When the alcohol content in the blood tested by the perpetrator did not meet the prescribed level of drunkenness, But the state of the perpetrator is obviously drunk or when the law enforcement personnel in some cases do not have the conditions to use breath or blood extraction to detect the two methods of detection, we need to use other auxiliary testing methods; For the identification of "road", it is necessary for the road to have two characteristics: public and public; "motor vehicle" also needs to be determined according to the existing regulations of the country, and the scope of motor vehicle should not be expanded at will, so as to meet the social conditions; On the other hand, the identification of "driving behavior" requires the actor to operate the motor vehicle to make it move before it can be recognized as driving behavior. Drunk driver should be indirectly intentional on the subjective level. "drunk driving" should not all be criminalized. The proviso of Article 13 of the Criminal Law is effective for this crime. Finally, it is effective for this crime and traffic accident crime and danger. Methods the boundary of crimes against public safety, It should be distinguished from the subjective aspect, the objective aspect and the form of crime of the three crimes, especially the crime of endangering public security by dangerous means. It is also necessary to consider the degree of danger of the criminal act, and to judge scientifically and reasonably what crime should be convicted and punished by the perpetrator.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨晓楠;;浅谈醉酒型危险驾驶罪[J];法制博览;2016年06期
2 陈京春;;抽象危险犯的概念诠释与风险防控[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2014年03期
3 郭小亮;罗云;;“醉驾型”危险驾驶罪中“驾驶行为”的理解和认定[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2014年02期
4 张爱晓;;危险驾驶罪与相关犯罪的界限与竞合——以危险驾驶罪的性质为视角[J];河北法学;2014年03期
5 李翔;;危险驾驶罪主观方面新论[J];法商研究;2013年06期
6 耿永洁;;浅析“醉酒型危险驾驶罪”的适用[J];法制与社会;2013年32期
7 刘艳;;醉驾与相关犯罪的界限问题分析[J];当代经济;2013年17期
8 谢望原;何龙;;“醉驾型”危险驾驶罪若干问题探究[J];法商研究;2013年04期
9 曹晓烨;;危险驾驶罪之醉酒驾驶行为探究[J];山西省政法管理干部学院学报;2013年01期
10 刘宪权;周舟;;危险驾驶罪主观方面的刑法分析[J];东方法学;2013年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 张明楷;;危险驾驶罪及其与相关犯罪的关系[N];人民法院报;2011年
2 莫洪宪 ;杨文博;;刑法修正案(八)“危险驾驶罪”之具体认定[N];检察日报;2011年
,本文编号:1674195
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1674195.html