刑法实质解释立场下的“敲诈勒索”解读

发布时间：2018-04-04 16:10

  本文选题：敲诈勒索罪　切入点：社会相当性　出处：《武汉纺织大学学报》2016年01期

【摘要】：我国刑法上"敲诈勒索"概念的模糊性,加上学理上的形式化解释,导致了对敲诈勒索罪理解和认定的混乱。现实中不少欠缺刑事可罚性的勒索行为,甚至正当的维权索赔行为,被错误当作敲诈勒索罪处理。敲诈勒索罪的合理认定,应秉持刑法谦抑精神,坚持实质解释的立场,从刑法的立法精神上准确把握"敲诈勒索"应有的不法内涵,通过社会相当性判断和构成要件相当性判断,对"敲诈勒索"进行质与量的界定,从而将那些在社会道德秩序内的"社会相当"行为和那些虽不具有社会相当性但未达到刑事可罚程度的勒索财物行为排除于犯罪圈之外。
[Abstract]:The fuzziness of the concept of "extortion" in criminal law of our country, together with the formal explanation in theory, leads to confusion of understanding and cognizance of the crime of extortion.In reality, many lack of criminal punishment for extortion, or even legitimate rights claims, have been wrongly treated as extortion.The reasonable determination of the crime of extortion should uphold the spirit of modesty of the criminal law, adhere to the position of substantive interpretation, and accurately grasp the illegal connotation of "extortion" from the legislative spirit of the criminal law.Through social equivalence judgment and constitutive element equivalence judgment, the author defines the quality and quantity of "extortion".Thus, the behavior of "social equivalence" in the social moral order and those extortion acts which do not have social equivalence but do not reach the level of criminal punishment are excluded from the criminal circle.
【作者单位】： 中南民族大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.3
，

本文编号：1710690