刑法中的暴力行为研究

发布时间：2018-04-05 09:13

本文选题：暴力行为　切入点：刑法功能　出处：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：暴力行为的发生作为一种普遍社会现象，不仅是社会学研究的内容，更是与刑法学关系密切。暴力行为相较一般行为往往具有强制性、胁迫性，对于社会造成的危害性大，不仅被社会舆论道德否定，，更上升到刑事法律打击的层面。暴力行为表现形式多样和复杂，造成了刑法理论以及司法实践上对于暴力行为的规制存在一定的混乱。表现为：刑法理论上没有对暴力行为的概念进行明确，造成了相似概念之间的混淆；刑法理论缺乏对暴力行为的系统研究以及同域外刑法的对比研究；暴力行为的拟制规定导致适用上违背了量刑均衡原则；对造成轻微伤的故意伤害行为入罪困难；新型暴力行为的立法存在不足；司法实践中存在对暴力行为的重复评价。鉴于此，对刑法中的暴力行为研究不仅是必要的而且是亟需的。对刑法中暴力行为的界定成为本文的逻辑起点，在此基础上，明确暴力行为在刑法上的地位是本文的价值追求，对暴力行为的立法和司法的考察是本文的理论与实践的结合点，最终明晰暴力行为之间的界限，发挥其对罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪的指导作用。全文共分为五个部分：第一个部分对刑法中的暴力行为进行了基本界定。分析了广义的暴力行为与我国刑法中的暴力行为，明确了刑法中暴力行为的涵义。同时，将暴力行为同胁迫行为、其他手段、暴力犯罪进行界分，避免相似概念之间的混同。第二个部分阐述了暴力行为入刑的价值，是对刑法中暴力行为进行理论梳理和司法实践探讨的根基。本部分从立法、司法两个方面阐述其入刑价值，具体从功能、目的、定罪、量刑四个维度进行深度挖掘。解决的是刑法为什么要规制暴力行为，以及规制暴力行为的意义所在。第三个部分对暴力行为进行了立法考察，包括立法现状和立法问题两个部分。首先，分别介绍了英美法系和大陆法系中代表性的国家对于暴力行为的规制情况，主要考察了不同于我国刑法中暴力行为规制情况的条文。其次，从暴力行为的分类以及特点上分析了我国刑法关于暴力行为的规制现状。最后，对我国立法中暴力行为的拟制规定，造成轻微伤的故意伤害行为的入罪标准，以及新型暴力行为的立法规制的合理性分别进行了探讨。第四个部分对暴力行为进行了司法考察。本部分仅针对我国的司法现状进行阐述，指出了我国实践中存在对暴力行为重复评价的问题。通过强奸罪、抢劫罪代表性案例的分析，对先强奸后取财行为的处理现状进行总结。具体分析了对暴力行为重复评价的问题的不合理之处。第五个部分对暴力行为进行了规范完善构想。包括立法完善、司法完善两个方面。针对暴力行为的拟制规定、故意伤害行为入罪、新型暴力行为规制三个方面进行法条和司法解释上的完善。司法实践中对暴力行为重复评价问题通过指导性案例予以完善。
[Abstract]:As a universal social phenomenon, the occurrence of violence is not only the content of sociological research, but also closely related to criminal law.Compared with the general behavior, violence is often mandatory and coercive, which causes great harm to the society. It is not only negated by public opinion and morality, but also rises to the level of criminal law.The various and complex forms of violent acts result in confusion in the regulation of violent acts in criminal law theory and judicial practice.The results are as follows: the concept of violence is not clearly defined in the theory of criminal law, which causes confusion between similar concepts, the theory of criminal law lacks systematic research on violence and the comparative study with foreign criminal law;The fictitious provisions of violent acts lead to the violation of the principle of balance of sentencing in application; the difficulty of criminalizing intentional injury caused by minor injuries; the insufficiency of legislation on new types of violence; and the repeated evaluation of violent acts in judicial practice.In view of this, the study of violence in criminal law is not only necessary but also urgent.The definition of violence in criminal law has become the logical starting point of this paper. On this basis, it is the value pursuit of this article to make clear the status of violence in criminal law. The study of legislation and judicature on violence is the combination of theory and practice.Finally, it clarifies the boundary between violence and exerts its guiding role to crime and non-crime.The full text is divided into five parts:The first part defines the violence in criminal law.This paper analyzes the generalized violence and the violence in the criminal law of our country, and clarifies the meaning of the violent act in the criminal law.At the same time, violence and coercion, other means, violent crime, to avoid the confusion between similar concepts.The second part expounds the value of violence in criminal law, which is the foundation of theoretical analysis and judicial practice of violence in criminal law.This part expounds the value of criminal law from two aspects of legislation and judicature, specifically from the four dimensions of function, purpose, conviction and sentencing.The solution is why the criminal law should regulate the violent behavior and the significance of regulating the violent behavior.The third part investigates the legislation of violence, including the current situation of legislation and legislative issues.First of all, it introduces the regulation of violence in the representative countries of Anglo-American law system and civil law system respectively, and mainly investigates the provisions which are different from the criminal law of our country in the regulation of violent acts.Secondly, it analyzes the current situation of the regulation of violence in criminal law of our country from the classification and characteristics of violence.Finally, the author discusses the fictitious provisions of violence in our legislation, the standard of intentional injury caused by slight injury, and the rationality of the legislative regulation of new type of violence.The fourth part carries on the judicial investigation to the violence.This part only expounds the current situation of our country's judicature, and points out the problem of repeated evaluation of violence in our country's practice.Through the analysis of the representative cases of rape and robbery, this paper summarizes the present situation of dealing with the behavior of rape and then taking money.The irrationality of repeated evaluation of violence is analyzed in detail.The fifth part has carried on the norm consummation idea to the violent behavior.It includes two aspects: legislative perfection and judicial perfection.In view of the fictitious regulation of violence, the crime of intentional injury and the regulation of new type of violence, three aspects of law and judicial interpretation are improved.The repeated evaluation of violence in judicial practice is perfected by instructive cases.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924

【参考文献】