当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

网络时代刑法客观解释新塑造:“主观的客观解释论”

发布时间:2018-04-05 12:47

  本文选题:网络 切入点:客观解释 出处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2017年03期


【摘要】:当下我国刑法应对日益严重的网络犯罪,采取的主要手段是通过"探究社会秩序的客观精神"以谋求对"社会现实的客观评价",在所有刑法解释方法中,刑法客观解释轻易获得了优位权。然而,法律的形式主义与概念主义传统固然有其缺陷不能否定,以扩张为导向的刑法客观解释导致"客观解释等同于扩张解释",形成了网络时代刑法网络治理的入罪化,并造成法律公权力对技术性网络空间自由的伤害,对网络时代公民自由权利的忽视。针对网络空间层出不穷的新型违法犯罪行为,应警惕客观解释论的过度使用;结合主观解释论的法治基因优势,宜以"主观的客观解释论"重新塑造网络时代刑法的客观解释论,即在网络犯罪的解释适用中,以客观解释为基础,同时其解释不能超出"刑法条文的语言原意"之范围,以主观解释作为客观解释之限定。
[Abstract]:At present, the criminal law of our country should deal with the increasingly serious cyber crime, the main means is to seek "objective evaluation of social reality" through "exploring the objective spirit of social order", and in all the methods of criminal law interpretation,Objective interpretation of criminal law has easily obtained superior position right.However, the tradition of formalism and conceptualism of law can not be denied. The objective interpretation of criminal law under the guidance of expansion leads to "objective interpretation is equal to the interpretation of expansion", which forms the criminalization of the network governance of criminal law in the network age.It also causes the harm of the legal public power to the freedom of the technical cyberspace and the neglect of the civil freedom right in the network age.In view of the emerging new type of illegal and criminal behavior in cyberspace, we should guard against the excessive use of objective explanation theory, combine the advantage of the rule of law gene of subjective interpretation theory,The subjective objective interpretation theory should be used to remodel the objective interpretation theory of the criminal law in the network age, that is, in the interpretation and application of the network crime, the objective interpretation should be based on the objective interpretation, and at the same time, its interpretation should not exceed the scope of "the original meaning of the language of the criminal law".Subjective interpretation is the limit of objective interpretation.
【作者单位】: 东南大学法学院;
【基金】:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(15YJA820015)“刑法出罪机制问题研究” 江苏省社会科学基金重大项目(14ZD003)“把握互联网'最大变量'核心问题研究”
【分类号】:D924.3

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前7条

1 任彦君;;遗弃罪中扶养义务的诠释——由一则案例引发的思考[J];华北水利水电学院学报(社科版);2007年05期

2 魏汉涛;;以客观解释论解读重婚罪[J];海南大学学报(人文社会科学版);2006年02期

3 王政勋;;论客观解释立场与罪刑法定原则[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2011年01期

4 王周文;;论我国遗弃罪主体的范围[J];公民与法(法学版);2011年07期

5 王军仁;;刑法应当客观解释[J];人民检察;2007年03期

6 关振海;;我国刑法第三条规定新论——基于客观解释的立场[J];四川师范大学学报(社会科学版);2010年01期

7 ;[J];;年期



本文编号:1714783

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1714783.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5998b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com