必要共同犯罪概念及其功能问题研究——一个域外概念的中国化思考

发布时间：2018-04-06 03:06

本文选题：必要共同犯罪　切入点：必要共犯　出处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2016年03期

【摘要】：基于中外刑法犯罪论体系、共同犯罪理论及立法的差异,我国刑法必要共同犯罪概念与德、日刑法必要共犯概念存在本质区别,二者实际上是处于不同层次的两个不同概念。在我国刑法中,必要共同犯罪与任意共同犯罪的分类功能在于区别二者的法律适用方式:对于任意共同犯罪,应当结合刑法总则共犯规定定罪量刑;对于必要共同犯罪,则应当排除刑法总则共犯规定之适用,仅根据刑法分则的相应规定定罪量刑。如此分类功能蕴含着极为重要的刑法意义,它不仅可以用来划定二者所含具体犯罪类型,还能用来区分并指导必要共同犯罪的刑法分则立法,并严格限制必要共同犯罪立法的处罚范围。
[Abstract]:Based on the differences between Chinese and foreign criminal law theory system, joint crime theory and legislation, there are essential differences between the concept of necessary joint crime and morality in criminal law of our country and the concept of necessary accomplice in Japanese criminal law. In fact, the two concepts are two different concepts at different levels.In the criminal law of our country, the classification function of necessary joint crime and arbitrary joint crime lies in distinguishing the applicable way of law between them: for any joint crime, the conviction and punishment should be combined with the general principle of criminal law, and for necessary joint crime,It should exclude the application of the general provisions of criminal law, only according to the corresponding provisions of the criminal law conviction and sentencing.The function of such classification contains the extremely important meaning of criminal law. It can not only be used to delimit the specific types of crimes contained in both, but also to distinguish and guide the legislation of the special provisions of criminal law that are necessary for joint crime.And strictly limit the scope of punishment of necessary joint crime legislation.
【作者单位】：厦门大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】