贪污罪共同犯罪问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-11 23:26

本文选题：贪污罪 + 共同犯罪　；参考：《中国政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：从“八项规定”的提出到“反四风”建设的施行,一场反腐倡廉、正身自省的浪潮席卷而来。在此大背景下,对于贪污犯罪的研究,尤其是厘清群体化、复杂化的贪污罪共同犯罪,成了一个历久弥新的命题,在司法实践中具有重要的指导意义。在材料的阅读和整理过程中,笔者发现,在该类犯罪的理论领域,研究与争议并存。甚至在某些实践问题中,犯罪定性的标准和量刑的尺度也难以统一,这就为司法实践带来了困扰。针对这一系列问题,笔者通过借鉴前辈学者的一些先进理论经验,结合自身法学知识和实践经验,运用比较分析、因果分析、实证分析以及文献援引等研究方法,对贪污罪共同犯罪的几个相关问题进行了分析,并提出了一些自己的见解。本文共分四章：第一章是贪污罪共同犯罪中存在的实践与理论问题。在本章中,笔者根据司法实践中出现的疑难问题,提出了刑事立法中对于共犯与身份定义的缺失问题,以及在贪污罪的共同犯罪中对各共犯人个人贪污数额的认定标准不统一的问题,并指出以上两类问题的存在,不利于对实践的指导。第二章是贪污罪共同犯罪认定问题探析。在本章中,重点是有身份人与无身份人共起犯意,利用有身份人的职务之便,侵吞公共财产应如何认定的问题。该问题在学术界中存有广泛的争议,在此基础上,笔者对该问题的一些观点进行了详细的分析论证,并初步提出了笔者自身对该问题的认定标准。第三章是贪污罪共同犯罪中数额认定与刑事责任问题探析。在本章中,笔者就如何理解贪污罪共同犯罪中“个人贪污数额”这一概念进行了分析。罗列了围绕贪污罪共同犯罪中个人贪污数额认定而确立的相关法条,以及各理论学说对此问题的不同看法,并初步提出了笔者自身对该问题的认定标准。第四章是贪污罪共同犯罪的立法改进与完善。本章立意在于解决前述贪污罪共同犯罪存在的实践问题,通过对各学说的甄别与凝练,提出在立法层面解决相关问题的对策。总得来讲,对于贪污罪共同犯罪的研究,一方面作用在于巩固自己所学知识,指导未来工作实践,另一方面也期望通过对该问题的分析总结,提出自己的看法,对刑事理论研究提供有益的探索。
[Abstract]:From the "eight regulations" to the implementation of "anti-four winds" construction, a wave of anti-corruption and self-examination came.In this context, the study of corruption crime, especially the clarification of the group crime, the complex joint crime of corruption, has become a long-lasting proposition, has an important guiding significance in judicial practice.In the course of reading and sorting the materials, the author finds that in the theoretical field of this kind of crime, research and controversy coexist.Even in some practical problems, it is difficult to unify the criteria of crime characterization and sentencing, which brings difficulties to judicial practice.In view of this series of problems, the author uses comparative analysis, causality analysis, empirical analysis and literature reference through some advanced theoretical experience of predecessors, combining their own legal knowledge and practical experience, and so on research methods, such as comparative analysis, causality analysis, empirical analysis and literature reference, etc.This paper analyzes several related problems of joint crime of corruption crime, and puts forward some opinions.This paper is divided into four chapters:The first chapter is the problem of practice and theory in the joint crime of corruption.In this chapter, the author puts forward the lack of definition of accomplice and identity in criminal legislation according to the difficult problems in judicial practice.It also points out that the existence of the above two kinds of problems is not conducive to the guidance of practice.The second chapter is the problem of joint crime of corruption.In this chapter, the emphasis is on how to identify the embezzlement of public property by using the position of the identifiable person.On the basis of this, the author makes a detailed analysis and argumentation on some viewpoints of the problem, and puts forward the standards of the author's own identification of the problem.The third chapter is the joint crime of corruption in the determination of the amount and criminal liability.In this chapter, the author analyzes how to understand the concept of "personal embezzlement amount" in the joint crime of corruption.This paper lists the relevant articles of law about the determination of the amount of personal embezzlement in the joint crime of embezzlement, as well as the different views of various theories on this issue, and puts forward the author's own standards for the determination of the problem.The fourth chapter is the legislation improvement and perfection of the joint crime of corruption.The purpose of this chapter is to solve the problems existing in the aforementioned joint crime of corruption, through the screening and condensing of each theory, put forward the countermeasures to solve the related problems at the legislative level.In general, for the study of joint crime of corruption, on the one hand, the purpose is to consolidate what one has learned and to guide future work practices; on the other hand, he expects to put forward his own views through the analysis and summary of this problem.To the criminal theory research provides the beneficial exploration.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】