刑事推定辨正

发布时间：2018-04-14 05:40

本文选题：刑事推定 + 犯罪构成要素符合性　；参考：《政治与法律》2017年11期

【摘要】：刑事推定是集程序法与实体法理论于一身的特殊问题。英美法系国家的刑事推定制度的产生以严格责任制的发展为基础,在社会历史的变迁中逐渐自我完善。我国刑事推定的理论探讨深受英美法系"重程序而轻实体"的影响,多将刑事推定纳入程序法学的范畴,忽略了实体法推定责任规范的司法适用对证明责任分配等的程序启动功能。在我国的刑事立法现状中,实体法上以推定责任代替严格责任入刑,而程序法上却只有无罪推定原则,立法者对推定规则的程序适用采取的是默许态度。在刑事推定规制路径的重构上,立法犯罪圈的划定应以人本主义理念为价值导向;刑事推定立法技术的归正,应严格遵循罪责刑相适应原则,以平衡人本主义理念导入与立法价值择取之间的冲突为技术标准。
[Abstract]:Criminal presumption is a special problem which combines procedural law and substantive law theory.The emergence of criminal presumption system in Anglo-American legal system is based on the development of strict responsibility system and has gradually improved itself in the course of social and historical changes.The theory of criminal presumption in our country is deeply influenced by the emphasis on procedure rather than substance in common law system, and the criminal presumption is brought into the category of procedural jurisprudence.It neglects the procedure starting function of the judicial application of the norm of presumption liability of substantive law to the distribution of burden of proof and so on.In the present situation of criminal legislation in our country, in substantive law, presumption liability is used instead of strict liability, but in procedural law there is only the principle of presumption of innocence. The legislator adopts acquiescence attitude to the procedure application of presumption rule.In the reconstruction of the regulation path of criminal presumption, the delineation of the legislative circle of crime should be guided by humanism, and the correction of the legislative technology of criminal presumption should strictly follow the principle of adaptation of crime, responsibility and punishment.The technical standard is to balance the conflict between the introduction of humanism and the choice of legislative value.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】