对构成要件齐备说的批判

发布时间：2018-04-14 09:12

本文选题：既遂标准 + 结构性　；参考：《中国政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：目前，我国犯罪既遂标准理论，除了位于通说地位的构成要件齐备说之外，还有目的说、结果说、法益侵害说。笔者认为，构成要件齐备说与其他三种学说的关系并不是并列的、彼此独立的横向关系，而是前者依附于后者的纵向关系。本文通过对两者区别和对两者的关系的分析，阐述构成要件齐备说存在以下缺点。结构性特征与其所要解决的问题单一性存在着矛盾；其以刑法分则规定是既遂模式为前提导致构成要件齐备说只能是解释性理论，，而非指导性理论。并且其所依据的前提是不真实的；由于构成要件齐备说本身没有真正内涵的形式主义缺陷和其对刑法分则的曲解，导致立足于犯罪既遂角度对危险犯概念所作的错误表述，得以在我国刑法分则第二章危害公共安全类犯罪中体现。
[Abstract]:At present, the standard theory of accomplished crime in our country, in addition to the complete elements in the position of general theory, there is the theory of purpose, the theory of legal interests infringement.The author believes that the relationship between the theory of complete elements and the other three theories is not parallel, but independent of each other's horizontal relationship, but the former is dependent on the latter's vertical relationship.Based on the analysis of the difference between the two and the relationship between them, this paper expounds that the theory of complete elements has the following shortcomings.There is a contradiction between the structural characteristics and the singularity of the problems to be solved, which, based on the premise of the accomplished mode in the special provisions of the criminal law, leads to the theory that the complete elements of the constitution can only be an explanatory theory, not a guiding theory.And the premise on which it is based is not true; due to the formalism defect of the complete elements of the constitution and its misinterpretation of the criminal law sub-rule, it leads to the wrong expression of the concept of dangerous crime based on the angle of accomplished crime.It can be reflected in the second chapter of criminal law.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.1

【参考文献】