巡防队员杜某等人受贿案评析

发布时间：2018-04-15 03:02

本文选题：国家机关工作人员 + 主犯　；参考：《湖南大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着国家人事制度改革的推进，国家机关、事业单位、国有企业等体制内单位探索形成了多种形式的用工制度，出现了各种称谓的编外人员，其中又以政法部门为最，如法院的聘任制书记员、聘用制书记员、合同制法警，公安机关的协警、辅警和巡防队员等。这类人员的共同特点是：他们不是正式公务员，但又都或多或少从事与公务相关的工作。由于以上特点，当这类人员发生违法行为特别是涉嫌构成犯罪时，如何认定其身份成为司法实践中的争议焦点，进而导致定罪量刑的重大不确定性。同时，该类人员的相关刑事案件在主犯与从犯区分、受贿罪、滥用职权罪与敲诈勒索罪相关罪名的确定等法律适用方面也可能存在争议。对该系列争议，首先需要解决的是犯罪主体身份的认定问题，也就是要解决以什么标准界定国家工作人员的问题。当前，学理界主要有身份说、公务说和身份与职责结合说三种观点，同一行为在不同的观点下将会产生不同的身份认定结果。三个观点侧重点不同，也各有优缺点。其次，刑法中的共同犯罪部分有“绝望的一章”的说法，这从一定程度上说明主犯与从犯区分的复杂性。此外，受贿罪、滥用职权罪与敲诈勒索罪三个罪名间既有联系又有区别，受贿罪与滥用职权罪有共同的犯罪主体，在一定的条件下存在数罪并罚的情况。受贿罪与敲诈勒索罪在犯罪的客观方面有相似性，，但由于两罪犯罪主体的差异，同一行为只可能构成其中一罪，不会出现受贿罪与敲诈勒索罪数罪并罚的情况。论文通过分析巡防队员杜某等人受贿案件中影响定罪量刑的三个争议焦点，依次研究了此类案件中国家机关工作人员身份认定、主犯与从犯区分及罪名确定等三个法律适用问题。
[Abstract]:With the advancement of the reform of the national personnel system, units in the systems of state organs, institutions, state-owned enterprises, etc., have explored and formed various forms of employment systems, resulting in various forms of non-staff personnel with various appellations, among which the political and legal departments are the most important.Such as the appointment of court clerks, the appointment of clerks, contract bailiffs, public security organs, auxiliary police and patrol officers.The common feature of such personnel is that they are not formal civil servants, but they are more or less engaged in civil service related work.As a result of the above characteristics, how to determine the identity of such persons, especially when they are suspected to constitute a crime, becomes the focus of controversy in judicial practice, which leads to the great uncertainty of conviction and sentencing.At the same time, the relevant criminal cases of this kind of personnel in the main and accessory crime distinction, bribery crime, abuse of power crime and extortion related offences related to the determination of the law may also be controversial.For this series of disputes, the first issue to be solved is the identification of the subject of crime, that is, to solve the problem of defining the state functionary by what criteria.At present, there are three kinds of views in the academic circle: identity theory, official theory and identity and duty theory, and the same behavior will produce different results of identity determination under different viewpoints.Each of the three points of view has its own merits and demerits.Secondly, there is a "desperate chapter" in the part of joint crime in criminal law, which explains the complexity of the distinction between principal and accessory to some extent.In addition, the crime of accepting bribes, the crime of abuse of power and the crime of extortion are related to and different from each other.The crime of accepting bribes and the crime of extortion are similar in the objective aspect of the crime, but because of the difference of the subject of the two crimes, the same act can only constitute one of the crimes, and there will not be the situation that the crime of accepting bribes and the crime of extortion are punished in combination with the crime of extortion.By analyzing the three focal points of controversy in the bribery case of patrol member du Mou et al., the paper studies the identification of the personnel of the state organ in this kind of case in turn.There are three problems in the application of the law: the distinction between principal offender and accessory offender and the determination of charge.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.392

【参考文献】