异种自由刑并罚的立法问题及其化解

发布时间：2018-04-16 18:57

本文选题：《刑法修正案(九)》 + 异种自由刑　；参考：《现代法学》2016年05期

【摘要】：《刑法修正案(九)》对异种自由刑并罚予以立法层面的明确规定,折射出立法者对数罪并罚原有空缺的格外重视。异种自由刑并罚的立法规定回应了实践所需,并试图针对性解决长期困扰理论与实践的棘手问题,但是修正案的现有规定并不能做出理论层面的合理性说明,隐藏在异种自由刑并罚中的刑罚失衡及其逻辑非自洽性值得我们深刻反思。异种自由刑并罚仍然应当以限制加重作为其适用的基础原则,并以重刑为基准进行异种刑之间的刑罚换算,在整体性视域内合理对待监禁刑与非监禁刑的折算,从而妥当解决并罚制度遗留的现实弊病,最终实现异种自由刑并罚适用时的规范化运行。
[Abstract]:The amendment of Criminal Law (9) > clearly prescribes the legislative level of concurrent punishment for different kinds of freedom, which reflects the special importance that legislators attach to the original vacancy of concurrent punishment for a number of crimes.The legislative stipulation of concurrent punishment of different kinds of free punishment responds to the needs of practice, and attempts to solve the thorny problems that have plagued theory and practice for a long time. However, the existing provisions of the amendment can not make the rationality of the theory level.The imbalance of penalty and its logic non-consistency hidden in different kinds of free punishment are worthy of our deep reflection.The basic principle of its application should still be the restriction and aggravation, and the penalty conversion between different kinds of punishment should be carried out on the basis of heavy punishment, and the commutation between imprisonment and non-imprisonment should be reasonably treated in the holistic view.Therefore, we can properly solve the practical defects left over by the system of concurrent punishment, and finally realize the standardized operation of the application of different kinds of free punishment.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;
【基金】：中央财政支持地方高校建设项目“特殊群体权利保障与犯罪预防研究”
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】