我国刑法因果关系论宜采取修正的相当因果关系说

发布时间：2018-04-21 08:45

本文选题：客观归责论 + 修正的相当因果关系说　；参考：《政治与法律》2017年02期

【摘要】：德国刑法学中的客观归责论并非完美的理论,在规范论、本体论和体系论方面存在严重缺陷。在维持现行犯罪论体系的前提下,中国刑法学不应全面借鉴客观归责论。提倡客观归责论、反对相当因果关系说的观点,不仅无视客观归责论的不足,而且夸大了相当因果关系说的危机,值得深入反思。客观归责论与相当因果关系说并非对立关系,修正后的相当因果关系说部分采取了客观归责方法论。批判客观归责论本身,并不等于否定客观归责方法论。修正的相当因果关系说更加契合我国刑法理论,它应当成为我国刑法因果关系论的发展方向。我国刑法因果关系论应当借鉴危险的现实化说的判断框架,并引进结果的抽象化说和综合判断说中的部分基准。
[Abstract]:The objective imputation theory in German criminal law is not perfect theory, and it has serious defects in normative theory, ontology and system theory. Under the premise of maintaining the current criminal theory system, Chinese criminal jurisprudence should not draw lessons from objective imputation theory. The viewpoint of advocating objective imputation and opposing the theory of equivalent causality not only ignores the deficiency of objective imputation, but also exaggerates the crisis of the theory of equivalent causality, which is worthy of further reflection. The theory of objective imputation and the theory of equivalent causality are not opposites, and the revised theory of equivalent causality adopts the methodology of objective imputation. Criticizing objective imputation does not mean denying objective imputation methodology. The revised equivalent causality theory is more in line with the theory of criminal law in China, and it should be the developing direction of the theory of causality in criminal law of our country. The causality theory of criminal law of our country should draw lessons from the judgment frame of the dangerous reality theory, and introduce the abstract theory of the result and some benchmarks of the comprehensive judgment theory.
【作者单位】：华中师范大学法学院;
【基金】：2016年国家社科基金后期资助项目“污染环境罪的客观归责研究”(项目编号:16FFX015)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D914

【相似文献】