创新中国贿赂犯罪刑法立法之选择——基于刑法预防功能的考察

发布时间：2018-04-22 22:40

本文选题：贿赂犯罪治理 + 预防功能　；参考：《南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学)》2017年04期

【摘要】：根据现代腐败的衍生机理与治理需要,世界主要国家反腐立法经历了由以惩治法为中心向以预防法为导向的重大转型,立法体系构建中扬弃了传统的以刑法为中心的应对策略,预防功能理论的优化,奠定了预防性刑法立法的基础。中国当下贿赂犯罪刑法立法虽几经修正,但因在立法定位选择上仍固守于"后发式"惩治的基点之上,应对"增量腐败"的预防能力仍有不足。腐败治理的深化时期,中国有必要合理借鉴域外经验,彻底更新腐败治理理念,通过确立"利益冲突"的法益判断基准,变革构成要件要素内容,以将预防功能植入于贿赂犯罪罪刑规范之中,实现中国刑法贿赂犯罪治理的根本转型。
[Abstract]:According to the derivative mechanism of modern corruption and the need of governance, the major countries in the world have experienced a major transformation from the punishment law as the center to the prevention law as the guidance. In the construction of the legislative system, the traditional strategy of taking criminal law as the center has been abandoned. The optimization of the theory of preventive function lays the foundation of the legislation of preventive criminal law. Although the current criminal law of bribery in China has been amended several times, the prevention ability to deal with "incremental corruption" is still insufficient because the legislative orientation is still stuck to the basic point of "post-style" punishment. During the deepening period of corruption governance, it is necessary for China to use foreign experience for reference, thoroughly renew the concept of corruption governance, and change the elements of constitutive elements by establishing the criterion of legal interest judgment of "conflict of interest". In order to put the prevention function into the crime and punishment norms of bribery crime, realize the fundamental transformation of bribery crime management in Chinese criminal law.
【作者单位】：东南大学反腐败法治研究中心;
【基金】：司法部课题(14SFB20020) 江苏高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地项目(2015JDXM004)
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】