网络诽谤犯罪的问题探究

发布时间：2018-04-23 12:27

本文选题：网络诽谤 + 刑法修正案　；参考：《吉林财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,随着互联网的普及,网络空间凭借其传播的快速及涵盖信息数量的巨大等特点逐渐成为人们生活中不可或缺的一部分。然而,网络在给人们生活带来便利的同时,一些违法犯罪行为也渐渐渗透其中,给我国的传统法律体系带来了新的挑战。尽管我国各地已经开始积极地打击网络诽谤行为,但是很多的网络诽谤问题还是引起了人们关于言论自由权和公民的名誉权、自诉与公诉等诸多争议。2015年正式颁布施行的《刑法修正案(九)》第16条对《刑法》第246条进行了修订:增加了一款作为条文的第三款:“通过信息网络实施第一款的规定的行为,被害人向人民法院告诉,但提供证据确有困难的,人民法院可以要求公安机关提供协助。”在互联网迅速发展的大背景下,网络犯罪近年来呈现出爆炸性的趋势,网络诽谤犯罪也已经成为全球关注的社会问题。针对网络诽谤犯罪问题,很多国家都进行了积极的探索。以德国和韩国为代表的大陆法系国家采取的一般是严厉的刑法防控模式;以美国为代表的英美法系国家对于网络诽谤行为采取的则是相对较为宽松的应对措施。虽然,修正案(九)在一定程度上有利于进一步惩治网络诽谤犯罪,但是由于网络犯罪具有隐蔽性高、传播迅速快、传播范围广等特点,仅仅凭借修正案(九)中的一个条款的笼统规定很难实现高效的实际操作,因此,在司法实践中,如何快速有效地打击网络诽谤犯罪,在保障公民的言论自由的同时,维护公民的隐私权、名誉权成为不断完善我国刑法体系的一个难题。我们应当充分借鉴和吸收其他国家在这一方面的成功经验,逐渐完善符合我国国情的网络诽谤犯罪的刑法规制体系。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the popularity of the Internet, cyberspace has gradually become an indispensable part of people's life by virtue of its rapid transmission and huge amount of information. However, while the network brings convenience to people's life, some illegal and criminal acts are gradually infiltrating into it, which brings new challenges to the traditional legal system of our country. Although all parts of our country have started to crack down on Internet libel, many online libel problems have aroused people's right to freedom of expression and citizens' reputation. Article 16 of the Criminal Law Amendment (IX), which was promulgated and implemented in 2015, amended article 246 of the Criminal Law by adding a third paragraph as a provision: "to implement the first paragraph through the information network." Acts specified in the paragraph, If the victim tells the people's court that it is really difficult to provide evidence, the people's court may request the assistance of the public security organ. " In the background of the rapid development of the Internet, cybercrime has shown an explosive trend in recent years, and the crime of Internet libel has become a social problem of global concern. Many countries have actively explored the crime of internet libel. The continental law countries represented by Germany and South Korea generally adopt the strict criminal law prevention and control model, while the common law countries, represented by the United States, take relatively lenient measures to deal with the online libel. Although the amendment (9) is conducive to further punishing the crime of libel on the Internet to a certain extent, because of its high concealment, rapid transmission and wide spread, It is difficult to achieve efficient practical operation only by the general provisions of one clause in Amendment (9). Therefore, in judicial practice, how to combat the crime of online libel quickly and effectively, while safeguarding citizens' freedom of speech, Maintaining citizens' right to privacy and reputation has become a difficult problem in perfecting our criminal law system. We should draw lessons from and absorb the successful experiences of other countries in this field, and gradually perfect the criminal law system of the crime of network libel, which is in line with the national conditions of our country.
【学位授予单位】：吉林财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】