再议过失危险犯——兼论事故类犯罪危险犯的设立

发布时间：2018-04-24 17:38

本文选题：过失危险犯 + 事故类犯罪　；参考：《河北法学》2017年10期

【摘要】：德日等域外国家已有过失危险犯之刑事立法,其刑法学界议题已从过失危险犯可否设立之应然问题转为司法实务之该当解释。我国学界依然处在可否设立之讨论阶段,该问题之解决路径可分为两个层面:理论层面和事实现状。从刑法学理层面讲,犯罪之成立包括主观罪过和客观危害(含行为之危险性),法益破坏之危险状态与实害结果同属于客观危害之行为结果,过失与故意同样具有主观之可谴责性,且过失犯之可罚性重在客观危害,危险状态其对法益之破坏不亚于实害结果,因此在理论层面过失危险犯是完全可以成立的。结合其他学科对我国安全生产事故之系统性的实证调研数据,纵向趋势虽有所改观,但是横向比较依然严峻,现今行政体制及经济发展政策的背景下,基于行政执法不严、实效不佳的前提,事故类犯罪危险犯之设立有其必要性。
[Abstract]:Germany and Japan and other foreign countries already have criminal legislation of negligent dangerous crime, and the subject of criminal law has changed from the question of whether the negligent dangerous crime can be established to the interpretation of judicial practice. The academic circles of our country are still in the stage of discussion on whether to establish the problem. The solution to this problem can be divided into two levels: theoretical level and factual situation. From the perspective of criminal theory, the establishment of crime includes subjective crime and objective harm (including the dangerous behavior, the dangerous state of legal interests destruction and the result of actual harm as well as the behavior result of objective harm). Negligence and intent have the same subjective reprehensible nature, and the punishment of negligent crime is the objective harm, and the dangerous state of its damage to the legal interests is no less than the result of actual harm, so in theory, the negligent dangerous crime can be established completely. Combining with the systematic research data of other disciplines on the safety of production accidents in China, although the vertical trend has changed somewhat, the horizontal comparison is still severe. Under the background of the present administrative system and economic development policy, based on the lax administrative law enforcement, The premise of poor actual effect is that it is necessary to set up the dangerous crime of accident type.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;四川农业大学;
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】