虐童行为的定性研究

发布时间：2018-04-25 13:48

本文选题：虐童行为 + 虐待罪　；参考：《沈阳师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：近几年虐童事件频繁发生，经过媒体一再的曝光，引起社会各界高度关注，但最后都是以行政处罚和或者民事赔偿结案，显然这种处罚力度没有有效地遏制虐童事件的发生，随着社会经济的发展和社会结构的不断变化，儿童与社会有了更多的接触，虐童主体在不断的扩大，除家庭成员外，还包括教师、保姆、邻居、继父母等，这些人是与儿童接触最多最亲密的人，犯罪手段表现的较为隐形，一般都没有造成严重的犯罪结果，正因为如此，在刑法上找不到一个合适的罪名来定性这些行为，儿童的身心健康一直处于危险边缘。有些人认为现行刑法中的故意伤害罪、寻衅滋事罪、猥亵儿童罪等罪名可以定性目前的虐童行为，而且虐童行为大多数没有造成严重的后果，因此，无须在重新评价这些行为。但是笔者认为，对这些没有造成严重后果但是影响恶劣的虐童行为也应当用刑法来规制。本文通过对三个不同的虐童案例分析罪与非罪，此罪与彼罪，运用比较研究法、语义分析法、逻辑分析法等法学方法，阐述不同主体在不同的环境实施的虐童行为在刑法上应当如何来定性，对这些虐童主体的身份特殊性进行分析归纳，同时，借鉴国外的法律对虐待罪的规定以及对虐待主体的界定，明确了虐童行为的内涵，在此基础上提出应当扩大虐待罪的主体，用虐待罪来定性虐童行为最为合适。虐童行为侵犯的是儿童的身心健康，对儿童身体的摧残和心理的折磨，剥夺了他们在共同生活中的平等权利，行为方式表现为一贯地、持续地，符合虐待罪的行为特征，，而且在国际上，虐待儿童也是个非常严重的问题，大多数国家也将其定性为虐待罪。因此，笔者认为随着社会的快速发展，刑法也日渐凸显其滞后性，目前刑法分则将虐待罪中的“家庭成员”限定在具有血亲关系、婚姻关系或者收养关系的人当中，并且要求在一个家庭中生活，概念过于狭窄，不利于对虐待行为的规制，应当扩大虐待罪的主体，来应对社会上出现的新情况。
[Abstract]:In recent years, child abuse incidents have occurred frequently, which have been repeatedly exposed by the media, which has aroused great concern from all walks of life in the society. However, in the end, they are all closed with administrative penalties or civil compensation. Obviously, this kind of punishment has not effectively curbed the occurrence of child abuse incidents. With the development of social economy and the constant changes of social structure, children have more contacts with society, and the main body of child abuse is constantly expanding. Besides family members, they also include teachers, nannies, neighbors, stepparents and so on. These people are the closest people who have the most contact with children, and the criminal methods are more invisible and generally do not result in serious criminal results. As a result, there is no suitable criminal law to characterize these acts. Children's physical and mental health has always been at risk. Some people think that the crimes of intentional injury, provocation, child molestation and so on in the current criminal law can be used to characterize the current child abuse, and that most of the child abuse has no serious consequences, therefore, there is no need to re-evaluate these acts. However, the author believes that child abuse, which has no serious consequences, should also be regulated by criminal law. Through the analysis of three different cases of child abuse, such as crime and non-crime, this crime and that crime, this article uses comparative research method, semantic analysis method, logic analysis method and other legal methods. This paper expounds how the child abuse behavior carried out by different subjects in different environments should be qualitatively defined in criminal law, and analyzes and sums up the identity particularity of these child abuse subjects, at the same time, Drawing lessons from the provisions of foreign laws on the crime of abuse and the definition of the subject of abuse, this paper clarifies the connotation of child abuse, and on this basis proposes that the subject of crime of abuse should be expanded, and that it is most appropriate to use the crime of abuse to characterize the act of child abuse. Child abuse violates the physical and mental health of the child, the physical and psychological torture of the child, and deprives them of their equal rights in their common life, in a manner that is consistent, consistent and consistent with the characteristics of the crime of abuse, Internationally, child abuse is also a serious problem, and most countries characterize it as a crime of abuse. Therefore, the author thinks that with the rapid development of the society, the criminal law is becoming more and more laggard. At present, the "family members" in the crime of maltreatment are limited to the persons with kinship, marriage or adoptive relationship. Moreover, the concept of living in a family is too narrow, which is not conducive to the regulation of maltreatment, so the subject of the crime of abuse should be expanded to deal with the new situation in the society.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】