论前科与死刑的限制适用

发布时间：2018-04-25 16:36

本文选题：前科 + 酌定量刑情节　；参考：《华东政法大学学报》2017年02期

【摘要】：前科对量刑(死刑适用)的影响,无论是趋重调节还是趋轻调节,既要考虑行为的社会危害性大小,也要考虑行为人的人身危险性程度。"谴责性理论""危害性理论"和"同情克减理论"共同为前科影响量刑(死刑适用)提供完整诠释框架。前科在域外死刑裁量实践中发挥着独特且重要的作用,我国实践中的惯性思维是将前科作为强化死刑适用的依据,而其限制、弱化死刑适用的积极功效却未被发掘。"无前科"属于前科情节的范畴,应高度重视其限制死刑适用的价值。在有前科的情况下,需综合衡量当下犯罪以及前科的实际情况,进行双重规范判断,根据是同种前科还是异种前科、故意前科还是过失前科、重罪前科还轻罪前科、前科是否经过一定期限、前科是否消灭等实际情况区别对待。
[Abstract]:The influence of criminal record on sentencing (application of the death penalty) should not only consider the magnitude of social harmfulness of behavior, but also the degree of personal danger of the perpetrator. " The theory of condemnation, the theory of harmfulness and the theory of derogation of sympathy provide a complete explanatory framework for the influence of criminal record on sentencing (application of death penalty). Criminal record plays a unique and important role in the practice of extra-territorial discretion of death penalty. The habitual thinking in our country's practice is to take the criminal record as the basis for strengthening the application of the death penalty, but its limitation and the positive effect of weakening the application of the death penalty have not been explored. " No criminal record "belongs to the category of previous circumstances, should attach great importance to its value of restricting the application of the death penalty." In the case of a criminal record, it is necessary to comprehensively measure the current crime and the actual situation of the criminal record, and to make a double standard judgment. It is based on whether the same kind of criminal record or another kind of criminal record, intentional or negligent, or felony or misdemeanor, Whether the criminal record after a certain period of time, whether the elimination of criminal record and other practical situations are treated differently.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院;
【基金】：2013年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目“中国特色前科消灭制度构建研究”(项目号13SFB3013)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】