网络名誉侵权犯罪的刑法规制研究

发布时间：2018-04-28 02:29

本文选题：名誉权 + 网络名誉侵权　；参考：《广西民族大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着我国网络的不断发展,网络对于人们社会生活的促进作用越来越明显,网络不仅仅只是公民进行信息获取与信息交流的平台,如今更是涉及到生活中的各个方面。但是网络如同一把双刃剑,它在给我们提供方便的同时也带来了各种法律问题,而其中就包括网络名誉侵权问题。网络名誉权是名誉权在网络环境中的延伸,而所谓“网络名誉侵权”,是指利用网络技术,侵犯他人的名誉权,是传统的名誉犯罪在网络中的一种新的表现形式,网络名誉侵权犯罪拥有自身的特点,即网络名誉侵权行为的隐蔽性,受害人的虚拟性,犯罪主体的不确定性以及网络名誉侵权言论影响范围广传播速度快,而当前我国网络名誉侵权犯罪主要有四种表现形式。域外相关的研究经验也是不可或缺的,英美法系国家与大陆法系国家均对名誉权的保护从宪法、民法、刑法等方面作了相应规定,其相同点在于在确定妨害名誉权的行为时,一般都以民事侵权法、刑事法律加以明确规定,同时都以行为的严重性来确定各自的保护范围,而在追究相应责任时,两大法系国家又大多都设置了阻却性事由。其不同点则主要体现为英美法系国对名誉权的保护方面主要以民事侵权的方式进行;大陆法系国家在对名誉权的保护方面更倾向于以刑事制裁为主、民事赔偿为辅的方式进行。我国法律对妨害名誉权行为的规定即对名誉权的保护近似于大陆法系国家,但是我过刑法中对“情节严重”的界定不够明确,在名誉权的保护中没有区分公众人物与非公众人物,使公民的名誉权与言论自由和舆论监督权的冲突没有得到妥善解决,这些都有待改进和完善。基于大量是文献和案例研究与域外经验相结合,针对于网络名誉侵权犯罪的特点和当前我国对此中犯罪的刑法规制所表现出的不足之处进行分析,进而提出针对性的解决措施。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of the network in China, the role of the network in promoting people's social life is becoming more and more obvious. The network is not only a platform for citizens to obtain and exchange information, but also involves all aspects of life. But the network is like a double-edged sword, it not only provides us with convenience, but also brings various legal problems, including network reputation infringement. Network reputation right is the extension of network reputation right in the network environment, and the so-called "network reputation infringement" refers to the use of network technology, encroaches upon others' reputation right, and is a new form of expression of traditional reputation crime in the network. The crime of network reputation infringement has its own characteristics, that is, the concealment of network reputation tort, the fictitious nature of the victim, the uncertainty of the subject of the crime and the rapid spread of the influence of the network reputation tort speech. At present, there are mainly four forms of network reputation infringement in our country. The relevant overseas research experience is also indispensable. Anglo-American law countries and civil law countries have made corresponding provisions on the protection of the right of reputation from the aspects of constitution, civil law, criminal law, etc. Their similarities lie in the determination of acts that impair the right to reputation. Generally civil tort law, criminal law to be clearly defined, at the same time, the seriousness of the act to determine their respective scope of protection, and in the investigation of the corresponding responsibility, the two major legal system countries have mostly set up to prevent sexual reasons. The differences are mainly reflected in the Anglo-American law system countries mainly in the protection of the right of reputation in the way of civil tort; in the civil law countries in the protection of the right of reputation is more inclined to criminal sanctions, civil compensation as a supplementary way to carry out. The protection of reputation right is similar to that of civil law countries, but the definition of "serious circumstances" in our criminal law is not clear enough. In the protection of the right of reputation, there is no distinction between public figures and non-public figures, so that the conflicts between citizens' reputation rights and freedom of speech and supervision of public opinion have not been properly resolved, which need to be improved and perfected. Based on a large number of literature and case studies combined with the extraterritorial experience, this paper analyzes the characteristics of network reputation infringement and the shortcomings of the criminal law regulation of this crime in our country, and then puts forward targeted solutions.
【学位授予单位】：广西民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】