刑法修正案的理性反思

发布时间：2018-04-30 06:42

本文选题：修正模式 + 刑法修正案　；参考：《甘肃政法学院》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：1997年之前,我国刑法修正采用的是单行刑法、附属刑法模式,总体来说利大于弊,而修正案模式具有无可比拟的优势,因此,1997年之后,刑法修正采用了修正案模式。从1999年到2011年的12年时间里,我国就有八部刑法修正案依次生效并实施。其内容对现行刑法典进行了大规模的修正,同时,从第部修正案开始,该种模式也成了唯一的刑法修订模式,而这种模式也在其保持法典形式的同一性以及刑法本身的稳定性方面发挥着自己的优势。但是纵观八部刑法修正案,除了其在形式方面存在问题其内容更是凸显了犯罪化和重刑化两个主导方面。对于这些问题,目前学界对其有正面的肯定,也有反面的批评本文既是以刑法修正案的内容为对象,从形式和内容两个方而重点对刑法修正案的形式及体现出的犯罪化和重刑化进行反思,最后对现有刑法修正案体现的刑法理念与今后刑法修正案应秉持的理念展开学理研讨。
[Abstract]:Before 1997, the amendment of criminal law in our country adopted the mode of single criminal law and subsidiary criminal law, generally speaking, the advantages were greater than the disadvantages, and the amendment mode had unparalleled advantages. Therefore, after 1997, the amendment mode of criminal law was adopted. In the 12 years from 1999 to 2011, there are eight amendments to criminal law in our country. Its content has carried on the large-scale amendment to the current criminal code, at the same time, from the first part of the amendment, this kind of model has also become the only criminal law revision model, This model also has its own advantages in maintaining the identity of the form of the code and the stability of the criminal law itself. But throughout the eight amendments to criminal law, in addition to its formal problems, its content highlights the two leading aspects of criminalization and severe punishment. For these problems, the academic circles have positive affirmation and negative criticism. This article is aimed at the content of the amendment of the Criminal Law. From the two aspects of form and content, the author rethinks the form of the amendment of criminal law and the criminalization and severe punishment embodied in the amendment of criminal law. Finally, it discusses the concept of criminal law embodied in the present amendment of criminal law and the idea that the amendment of criminal law should uphold in the future.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924

【参考文献】