产品刑事责任中的结果归责问题

发布时间：2018-04-30 08:33

本文选题：产品刑事责任 + 结果归责　；参考：《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：以条件公式为唯一标准的传统因果关系理论,已经无法满足产品刑事责任领域结果归责的现实需求。晚近以来出现的疫学因果关系和风险升高理论,是一种与传统条件关系型因果完全不同的新兴结果归责类型。在产品刑事责任领域引入此类概率提升型因果,能有效解决实践中大量存在的由于无法将行为的不法部分与其他作用因素相分离而难以认定具体因果关系,以及一般因果法则尚不明确的结果归责难题。当然,由于概率提升型因果在本质上降低了事实关联性程度的要求,容易造成刑法归责范围的扩张,因而其在产品刑事责任中的适用范围也应受到严格限定。
[Abstract]:The traditional causality theory with conditional formula as the sole standard can no longer meet the actual demand of product criminal liability result imputation. Recently, the theory of epidemic causality and increased risk is a new type of result imputation completely different from the traditional conditional causality. Introducing this kind of probabilistic ascending causality in the field of product criminal responsibility can effectively solve the problem that the illegal part of the act can not be separated from other factors in practice, which makes it difficult to identify the specific causality. And the result imputation difficult problem that general causality law is not clear yet. Of course, the probabilistic promotion causality in essence reduces the requirement of fact relevance, and it is easy to cause the expansion of criminal liability scope, so its application scope in product criminal liability should be strictly limited.
【作者单位】：厦门大学法学院;
【基金】：2017年度福建省社会科学规划项目“刑法保护前置化问题研究”(FJ2017C003)
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】