起哄闹事型寻衅滋事罪研究

发布时间：2018-04-30 22:41

本文选题：寻衅滋事 + 起哄闹事　；参考：《南京师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：寻衅滋事罪源于1979年刑法第160条规定的流氓罪。1997年刑法第293条规定的寻衅滋事罪有四种表现形式,相比较前三种,第四种起哄闹事型的案件数量相对较少。但是,起哄闹事型寻衅滋事罪在文字表述上抽象性较强,理解较困难,在实践中容易出现司法认定上的差错。本文就是基于刑法谦抑性原则和明确性原则,研究起哄闹事型寻衅滋事罪在司法认定上存在的诸多争议和问题,明确该罪的性质和特征,界定其适用范围,厘清罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪的界限,增强司法实践的可操作性,保障公民权利。本文共分为五章。第一章为概述,首先介绍起哄闹事型寻衅滋事罪的渊源,评析废止论和保留论的观点,提出目前不应废除寻衅滋事罪。第二章阐述该罪的构成要件。本章对公共场所、公共场所秩序、起哄闹事等关键词的内涵展开分析,提出起哄闹事行为具有煽动性、公然性、扩展性的特征,明确流氓动机是寻衅滋事罪的主观要素。第三章研究该罪的适用问题,即对该罪在司法实践中常被适用于规制网络造谣传谣行为和非正常上访行为进行研究。本章结合两高司法解释,提出网络空间属于公共场所,但“造成公共秩序严重混乱”中的公共秩序应限制解释为现实社会的公共秩序;可结合比例原则来处理言论自由与公共秩序的冲突问题;对有严重社会危害性的非正常上访中的起哄闹事型寻衅滋事行为应当依法定罪量刑。第四章论述起哄闹事型寻衅滋事罪与相关聚众类犯罪、编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪、扰乱国家机关工作秩序罪等易混淆罪名之间的界限,提出可用想象竞合犯的处罚原则来处理该罪与相关犯罪之间的关系。第五章分析该罪的司法现状,提出应当从立法和司法两个环节进行改进。
[Abstract]:The crime of provoking and causing trouble originates from the crime of hooliganism stipulated in Article 160 of the Criminal Law of 1979. There are four forms of the crime of provoking trouble as stipulated in Article 293 of the Criminal Law of 1997. Compared with the first three types, the number of cases of the fourth type of disturbance is relatively small. However, the crime of causing trouble by hooting is abstract in words and difficult to understand. It is easy to make mistakes in judicial cognizance in practice. Based on the principle of modesty and clarity of criminal law, this paper studies many disputes and problems in the judicial cognizance of the crime of causing disturbances, clarifies the nature and characteristics of the crime, defines its scope of application, and clarifies the crime and non-crime. The boundary between this crime and that crime strengthens the operability of judicial practice and protects the civil rights. This paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is an overview, first of all, it introduces the origin of the crime of hooting and causing trouble, comments on the views of abolition theory and reservation theory, and points out that the crime of provoking and causing trouble should not be abolished at present. The second chapter expounds the constitutive elements of the crime. This chapter analyzes the connotation of public places, public places order, hooting and other key words, puts forward that the hooting behavior has the characteristics of sedition, publicity and expansibility, and clarifies that the motive of hooliganism is the subjective element of the crime of provoking and causing trouble. The third chapter studies the application of the crime, that is, the crime in judicial practice is often applied to regulate the network rumour spreading behavior and abnormal petition behavior. This chapter combines the two high judicial interpretation, proposed that the cyberspace belongs to the public place, but the public order in "cause the public order serious confusion" should be limited to the real society public order; The conflict between freedom of speech and public order can be dealt with in combination with the principle of proportionality; The fourth chapter discusses the boundary between the crime of hooting and causing trouble and the crime of gathering a crowd, fabricating, deliberately disseminating false terrorist information, disturbing the work order of state organs, and so on. This paper puts forward the punishment principle of imaginative concurrence crime to deal with the relation between the crime and the related crime. The fifth chapter analyzes the current situation of the crime and puts forward that it should be improved from the two aspects of legislation and judicature.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】