网络中立帮助行为的刑法问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-04 16:17

本文选题：中立帮助行为 + 正犯　；参考：《华侨大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：中立帮助行为的争议源于德国学者的提出,进而衍生了刑法学界的关注及讨论。突飞猛进的互联网发展,更是为传统的中立帮助行为带来了全新的挑战,随着《刑法修正案(九)》的出台,网络中立帮助行为在学界形成了热切议论的焦点,其中第28条、29条第2部分分别对网络服务商违反信息网络安全管理义务的行为、网络技术提供者提供网络技术支持与帮助行为的入罪作了规定,在一定程度上对一些将要或者正在实施的相关网络犯罪起到遏制作用,但在适用上仍然存在很多亟需解决问题。比如,由于条文的表述较为抽象,入罪标准甚是模糊,导致罪与非罪之间难以确定;刑事责任承担的形式存在着一定的交叉与重叠,导致选择适用罪名的困难等。因此,针对以上问题,根据国内外有关中立帮助行为入罪原理,结合网络服务的相关特征,从行为危害后果、主观恶性程度、社会影响轻重等方面入手,对新设置的罪名明确其入罪标准,同时,根据现有的共犯模式、正犯模式以及不作为模式三种责任形态,进一步对网络中立帮助者到底应当承担何种责任形式做具体区分,从而为司法实践的运用提供切实可行的方法路径,实现司法的公平与公正。诚然,面对日益猖獗的网络犯罪,《刑法修正案(九)》的出台的确对相关网络犯罪具有一定的威慑打击作用,其大致方向是十分正确的,但同时我们应当看到,社会的发展离不开科技的创新,特别是网络领域的技术创新,更是对一个国家的发展至关重要。因此,在入罪基础之上也应兼顾到网络技术的创新发展,以正当业务抗辩为切入点为网络中立帮助者设置一个出罪机制,以求在打击犯罪与保障创新、保障自由之间取得一个平衡点,实现社会健康、有序、可持续发展。
[Abstract]:The dispute of neutral helping behavior originates from the German scholars' proposal, and then gives rise to the concern and discussion in the field of criminal law. The rapid development of the Internet has brought a new challenge to the traditional neutral help behavior. With the introduction of the Criminal Law Amendment (9), the online neutral help behavior has become a hot topic in academic circles. Article 28, Article 29, part 2, respectively provides for the incrimination of network service providers who violate the obligations of information network security management, and network technology providers who provide network technical support and help. To some extent, it can restrain some related cybercrime that will be or is being carried out, but there are still many problems that need to be solved in its application. For example, because the expression of the articles is abstract and the standard of incrimination is very vague, it is difficult to determine between the crime and the non-crime; the form of criminal responsibility bears some overlap and overlap, which leads to the difficulty of choosing the applicable crime and so on. Therefore, in view of the above problems, according to the principle of criminalizing neutral help behavior at home and abroad, combining with the relevant characteristics of network services, starting with the consequences of behavior harm, the degree of subjective malignancy, the degree of social influence, and so on, At the same time, according to the existing accomplice mode, principal offense model and omission mode, the author makes a specific distinction between the net neutral helper and the net neutral helper, according to the three kinds of responsibility forms: accomplice mode, principal offense mode and omission mode. Thus provides the practical method path for the judicial practice application, realizes the judicial fairness and the justice. It is true that in the face of the increasingly rampant cyber crime, the introduction of the Criminal Law Amendment (9) does have a certain deterrent effect on the related cybercrime, and its general direction is quite correct, but at the same time, we should see that The development of society is inseparable from the innovation of science and technology, especially the technological innovation in the field of network, which is of great importance to the development of a country. Therefore, on the basis of incrimination, we should also take into account the innovation and development of network technology, and set up a crime mechanism for network neutral helpers from the point of view of legitimate business defense, in order to combat crime and ensure innovation. To ensure a balance between freedom, social health, order, sustainable development.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】