浅论“终身监禁”

发布时间：2018-05-06 02:14

本文选题：终身监禁 + 刑罚目的　；参考：《中国社会科学院研究生院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：《刑法修正案(九)》对我国刑法第383条和386条贪污、受贿罪的处罚进行了修订,按照贪污的数额和情节重新设定了法定刑,其中规定对特重大贪污受贿犯罪“被判处死刑缓期执行的,人民法院根据犯罪情节等情况可以同时决定在其死刑缓期执行二年期满依法减为无期徒刑后,终身监禁,不得减刑假释。”这是终身监禁一词首次出现在我国刑法中,就此引起了学界广泛的争议,赞赏推广者有之,批评反对者有之,茫然不知者有之。本文就围绕我国终身监禁和学界的争议展开,旨在明确我国终身监禁的立法价值及性质,对其在我国未来的立法和适用进行研究。首先,对于我国终身监禁的立法和司法现状进行介绍,以《刑法修正案(九)》引进终身监禁的立法目的为背景,对特重大贪污受贿犯罪适用终身监禁进行立法评价,说明其有好处亦有弊端,从而提出其在我国立法和司法中存在的争议和问题。其次,通过对国外终身监禁刑事立法和司法的比较分析,确定目前我国终身监禁的性质是什么。即我国《刑法修正案(九)》中规定的终身监禁不同于国外的终身监禁,根据法教义学对现有立法条文进行解释可知,它只是死缓的执行方式,并非独立的刑罚也非保安处分。最后,对终身监禁在我国未来的立法和适用进行讨论,通过对终身监禁的固有缺陷进行分析,得出终身监禁不能作为死刑替代措施扩大化适用到其他罪名中的结论。此外,笔者建议日后废除贪污受贿犯罪死刑时也能够废除此次对贪贿罪犯适用终身监禁的立法。笔者认为未来终身监禁在我国只能作为严重暴力犯罪和恐怖犯罪的保安处分适用,这是符合我国刑法改革的趋势的。
[Abstract]:Amendments to the Criminal Law (9) revised the penalties for embezzlement and bribery in articles 383 and 386 of the Criminal Law of China, and re-established the statutory penalties according to the amount and circumstances of corruption. The people's court may, according to the circumstances of the crime, decide at the same time that the death penalty shall be commuted to life imprisonment after the expiration of two years' suspension of execution according to the law. No commutation of sentence or parole. " This is the first time that the term life imprisonment appears in the criminal law of our country, which has caused extensive controversy in academic circles. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the legislative value and nature of life imprisonment in China, and to study its future legislation and application in China. First of all, the legislative and judicial status quo of life imprisonment in China is introduced. Based on the legislative purpose of introducing life imprisonment in the Criminal Law Amendment (9), the legislative evaluation on the application of life imprisonment in the crime of corruption and bribery is carried out. It shows that it has advantages and disadvantages, and puts forward the disputes and problems in our country's legislation and judicature. Secondly, through the comparative analysis of foreign criminal legislation and judicature of life imprisonment, we can find out the nature of life imprisonment in our country. That is, the life imprisonment stipulated in our country's Criminal Law Amendment (9) is different from that in foreign countries. According to the interpretation of the existing legislative provisions in the doctrine of law, it is only a suspended execution mode, not an independent penalty nor a security measure. Finally, this paper discusses the future legislation and application of life imprisonment in our country. By analyzing the inherent defects of life imprisonment, it concludes that life imprisonment cannot be extended to other crimes as an alternative to the death penalty. In addition, the author suggests that the death penalty for corruption and bribery should be abolished in the future. The author thinks that life imprisonment can only be applied as a security measure for serious violent crime and terrorist crime in our country in the future, which is in line with the trend of criminal law reform in our country.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】