当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

撬门出租他人房屋案的法律分析

发布时间:2018-05-08 03:39

  本文选题:撬门 + 出租 ; 参考:《首都经济贸易大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:随着社会发展,以往我们认知的简单侵犯财产类犯罪,由于犯罪分子的手段、犯罪形式的变化出现了更多复杂的情况。司法实践中,,在认定某行为时,常常遇到涉及多个罪名相互交织的复杂问题,如何定罪就成了关键问题。本文选取一个撬门出租他人房屋的案例,通过分析案件中行为人的行为及学者之间不同观点的分歧,结合法律基本理论对本案涉及的法律问题进行了分析。文章先是介绍了本案的实际发生经过,然后将其中所涉及的有争议的法律问题进行了一一罗列,然后将行为人的行为与不当得利、无权代理、盗窃、诈骗等行为做了逐一对比,发现行为人的行为按照现有法律规定而言,与任何一个具体罪名或者制度的构成要件都不相符合。因此,就该案而言,实践中该如何定罪也就成了一个比较棘手的问题。本文经过论述,结合目前我国的司法现状,大胆地提出了将行为人按照罪刑法定原则做无罪处理,以牺牲个案的方式来换取立法的进步,希望该设想能够为理论研究提供一点可借鉴的素材。
[Abstract]:With the development of society, the simple crime of infringing on property that we used to know, because of the means of the criminal, the change of the crime form has appeared more and more complicated situation. In judicial practice, when determining a certain behavior, it is often met with complex problems involving multiple crimes, and how to convict becomes a key problem. This paper selects a case of prying doors to rent out other people's houses, and analyzes the legal problems involved in this case by analyzing the behavior of the perpetrators and the differences of views among scholars, and combining with the basic theory of law. The article first introduces the actual occurrence of this case, then lists the controversial legal issues involved in it, and then compares the behavior of the perpetrator with improper enrichment, unauthorized agency, theft, fraud and so on. It is found that the behavior of the perpetrator does not accord with any specific charge or system according to the existing law. Therefore, in this case, the practice of how to convict has become a more difficult problem. This paper discusses, combining with the current judicial situation in our country, boldly proposes to treat the perpetrator innocent according to the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime, and to sacrifice the individual case in exchange for the progress of legislation. It is hoped that this idea can provide some reference materials for theoretical research.
【学位授予单位】:首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 牛忠志;牛颖颖;;民事违法与犯罪界分之我见[J];重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版);2010年06期

2 张光宇;;刑民界说的价值分析[J];福建警察学院学报;2010年06期

3 常国丽;;论不当得利的制度功能[J];法制与社会;2011年33期

4 张慧聪;;浅析非法侵入住宅罪[J];法制与社会;2012年17期

5 陈霁月;;试论不当得利之“利益”[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年06期

6 樊冰;;浅谈非法侵入住宅罪[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年06期

7 杨柳;;论虚拟财产的刑法保护[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年03期

8 康凯丽;陈

本文编号:1859823


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1859823.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户a39d6***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com