中国金融刑法法益之理论辨正与定位革新

发布时间：2018-05-10 13:43

本文选题：金融刑法 + 法益选择　；参考：《法学评论》2017年06期

【摘要】：金融刑法的法益定位与立场选择,无法超然于一国金融法制构建的价值定位要求,也受制于作为其上位法的经济刑法法益选择的一般要求。中国现行金融刑法立法体系成型于中国第三次现代化转型初期,囿于财政金融"一体化"模式而形成的"秩序法益观",成为创建与发展立法体系的基本立场,这一导向因过分夸大金融秩序维护对刑法的依赖功能,存在使金融刑法沦为金融准入与内外部金融秩序维护工具的风险。脱离于金融法制体系转型目标的立法建构,对已然成为金融法制核心的金融交易利益与金融信用法益采漠视态度,造成法益定位导向上的严重缺陷。金融发展第三次浪潮中,中国金融刑法惟在实现由"秩序法益观"向"秩序导向下的利益法益观"转变的同时,确立金融交易利益的核心地位,以金融信用利益取代"金融秩序",据以实现金融刑法体系的完善目标。
[Abstract]:The legal interest orientation and position choice of the financial criminal law cannot be separated from the value orientation requirement of the construction of a country's financial legal system, and it is also subject to the general requirements of the economic criminal law interest choice as its superior law. The current financial criminal law legislation system of China was formed in the initial stage of the third modernization transformation of China, and the view of order law interests formed by the mode of "integration" of finance and finance has become the basic stand for the establishment and development of the legislative system. This guidance exaggerates the dependence function of financial order maintenance on criminal law, which makes financial criminal law become financial access and internal and external financial order maintenance tools. The legislative construction, which is divorced from the target of the transformation of the financial legal system, ignores the interests of financial transactions and the legal interests of financial credit, which has become the core of the financial legal system, resulting in serious defects in the orientation of legal interests. In the third wave of financial development, China's financial criminal law has established the core position of financial transaction interests while realizing the transformation from "order legal interests" to "interest legal interests under the guidance of order". The financial order should be replaced by the benefit of financial credit in order to achieve the goal of perfecting the financial criminal law system.
【作者单位】：上海社会科学院法学研究所;
【基金】：上海社会科学院人才引进项目上海社会科学院“刑事法学创新学科”阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】