刑法司法解释探究
发布时间:2018-05-13 00:23
本文选题:刑法司法解释 + 溯及力 ; 参考:《上海师范大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:刑法司法解释是我国刑事审判和裁定中的一项重要制度,是司法解释的重要组成部分,它对于保障刑法典及其刑事法规的正确贯彻和实施起着非常重要的作用。然而其仍然存在着一些问题。我国目前的司法解释存在着司法权入侵立法权、解释主体矛盾、溯及力争议等问题,这些问题的存在并不可因为社会的发展而被忽视。十八届四中全会重点在于依法治国,建设中国特色社会主义的法治国家,刑法实施是最具有代表性的法治表现之一,这些矛盾的存在已经影响到了我国的法治建设。因此,构建一个科学合理的解释模式具有十分重要的现实意义。本文共四大部分,其主要内容如下:第一部分,讨论了刑法司法解释的性质与对象。性质与对象对刑法司法解释而言非常重要,将这些问题阐述清楚可以为下文解决问题打好基础。并且笔者在这部分提出了与通说不同的观点,包括承认刑法司法解释的相对独立性以及解释的对象包含了法律文本与法律事实两部分。第二部分,对刑法司法解释的合法性与合理性进行了阐述。本部分笔者从合法性与合理性两个方面予以论述,解决刑法司法解释存在可能性以及必要性的问题,是研究刑法司法解释的必要基础部分。第三部分,重点阐述刑法司法解释存在的问题。主要分析了司法权入侵立法权以及刑法司法解释溯及力的问题。探究了其具体表现、产生的原因以及专家学者的观点,加以笔者自己的一些看法。第四部分,针对我国国情提出的完善建议。对现行刑法司法解释的完善建议,笔者认为不能一蹴而就,需要分阶段进行。笔者分别从短期以及长期两个阶段提出了建议,立足我国司法解释的体制,适当引入西方判例法官解释体制,再结合一些司法体制自身的改革,希望能对我国现行刑法司法解释的完善有所裨益。
[Abstract]:Judicial interpretation of criminal law is an important system in criminal trial and adjudication in China. It is an important part of judicial interpretation. It plays a very important role in ensuring the correct implementation and enforcement of criminal code and its criminal laws and regulations. However, there are still some problems. There are some problems in the judicial interpretation in our country, such as the judicial power invading the legislative power, explaining the contradiction of the main body, retroactive controversy and so on. The existence of these problems can not be ignored because of the development of the society. The focus of the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee is to run the country according to law and build a socialist country ruled by law with Chinese characteristics. The implementation of criminal law is one of the most representative manifestations of the rule of law. The existence of these contradictions has affected the construction of the rule of law in our country. Therefore, the construction of a scientific and reasonable interpretation model has a very important practical significance. The main contents of this paper are as follows: the first part discusses the nature and object of judicial interpretation of criminal law. Nature and object are very important to the judicial interpretation of criminal law. In this part, the author puts forward different views, including the recognition of the relative independence of the judicial interpretation of criminal law and the object of interpretation, including the legal text and legal facts. The second part expounds the legality and rationality of the judicial interpretation of criminal law. In this part, the author discusses from the aspects of legality and rationality, and solves the problems of the possibility and necessity of judicial interpretation of criminal law, which is the necessary foundation of the study of judicial interpretation of criminal law. The third part focuses on the problems existing in the judicial interpretation of criminal law. This paper mainly analyzes the retroactive effect of judicial power invading legislative power and judicial interpretation of criminal law. This paper probes into its concrete performance, causes and the viewpoints of experts and scholars, and puts forward some views of the author himself. The fourth part, according to the situation of our country puts forward the perfect suggestion. The author thinks that the judicial interpretation of the current criminal law can not be accomplished overnight, but should be carried out in stages. Based on the system of judicial interpretation in our country, the author puts forward some suggestions from the short and long periods, introducing the system of judicial interpretation of western precedent judges, and combining with the reform of some judicial system itself. It is hoped that it will be beneficial to the perfection of the judicial interpretation of the current criminal law in our country.
【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D924
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 李志增;;刑法司法解释的效力性质初探[J];法律学习与研究;1990年05期
2 黄瑞敏;;试论刑法解释权的改革[J];岭南学刊;2010年04期
3 陈金钊;司法过程中的法律发现[J];中国法学;2002年01期
4 梁根林;罪刑法定视域中的刑法适用解释[J];中国法学;2004年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 刘雪峰;我国刑法司法解释若干问题研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
2 曾琳;我国刑法司法解释权配置模式评判与重构[D];华东政法学院;2005年
,本文编号:1880830
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1880830.html